From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 28870 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2020 02:35:04 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 29 Oct 2020 02:35:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 9813 invoked by uid 550); 29 Oct 2020 02:34:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 9791 invoked from network); 29 Oct 2020 02:34:59 -0000
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail;
	t=1603938886; bh=eW+U22mKbntaCYfxLQ5OLyhRVhwf9p/e5Lqh3DI33QE=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=YofIlrYVHuNACak4ymhRFF4kgt1S0Rv27emteHVleKWZpkQv68/b1gROLGmmKP4IM
	 eMXnl4ElZfQZt+dMh85qSnoxIYoaN4mmMS05O+mZ0eAagQB72rjeH8IkskuG/sfJYE
	 OtE8Qx22zSawIYbQvHXoqD2FGRabzmvTH8D+5fgOG9f8xiUXTOyAVAeFUJ8OoXld/m
	 79cJqDDIR7Xgf7+JQgFIc2CzP3vrvsxK6N5jPI9oLOZ32en/8yo0ukoaMRM6HrDv2/
	 nYQhtxemg02nub4K4Lc2eWqfXr3ZTRq+S+FPB4v2rVw5MVU+phEW/1mj8LEYjjsxma
	 3lF1yD5Ur34FQ==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89rico_Nogueira?= <ericonr@disroot.org>
To: <musl@lists.openwall.com>, <musl@lists.openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 23:24:23 -0300
Message-Id: <C6P0NTZ43RQ4.AK8DN2JDBPMK@mussels>
In-Reply-To: <3634W4XGB9R4L.2UYZLDJ6W0AET@mforney.org>
Subject: Re: [musl] qemu-user and musl

On Wed Oct 28, 2020 at 1:50 PM -03, Michael Forney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get various musl compatibility issues in qemu fixed
> upstream. Here are the issues I've encountered:

That's great!

Have you explored runtime differences between musl and glibc, as well?
We have a bug report [1] in Void for qemu-aarch64-static's behavior when
built with musl, where it seems unable to connect to the network.

>From the bug report:

  # ip address
  netlink receive error Message too long (90)

I haven't investigated the issue yet, but since you were talking about
qemu, I thought it would be a good opportunity to mention it.

- [1] https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/issues/23557