From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 22389 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2020 12:50:32 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Dec 2020 12:50:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 32182 invoked by uid 550); 6 Dec 2020 12:50:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 30366 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2020 12:48:52 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cmpwn.com; s=key1;
	t=1607258965;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:  in-reply-to:in-reply-to;
	bh=xytP2OGWdbjtP1Z6vS1K8c2fYPPPmEGZvmBP4SEGWPM=;
	b=KyPfKe1/d/b1BLg2uibbdxkHRNdcTYy2e6pVOC/4fAbWTxmYDh99sPZtRDW6VKFVCHEroa
	xULQM/ZqWxF7qS9w8CsdqlU6PWKAbzDcnBH/+SfWOeYpn2r1/36yPzb96sGl46sP+jdU/y
	cDxNyBVmsB3tUmYJFdzjaFkkNZpsew1CscLPs1V/AdJDdzAgn8fw9bz6rF9h/5f6PhAoFl
	1Q+JNLb/6I567a+EJYbXuu+s5pT8gNFVaWn62pOv+OikNJKVmwn2UR4ux+EfKwfdM3akPh
	Qov8aiT6RA0ZqBXEPrF6uJwTktDMBLhV4x4MqJvy1+cN/VhoacXuwUe0/9Kw0g==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: <musl@lists.openwall.com>
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
From: "Drew DeVault" <sir@cmpwn.com>
To: "Szabolcs Nagy" <nsz@port70.net>
Message-Id: <C7LPPDEK9MIU.2E0M7RCVVZ08V@taiga>
In-Reply-To: <20201206085134.GS1370092@port70.net>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT
X-Migadu-Auth-User: sir@cmpwn.com
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 12:49:25 GMT
Subject: Re: [musl] [PATCH v2] riscv64: correct struct __ucontext name


On Sun Dec 6, 2020 at 3:51 AM EST, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> * Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com> [2020-12-05 18:10:06 +0000]:
> > This makes it consistent with other architectures and fixes some issues
> > with downstream software.
>
> which software?
>
> glibc uses struct ucontext_t too and user code should use ucontext_t
> without struct.

libucontext, which does use ucontext_t.

In fact, the issue was more related to the type conflict with
ucontext.h, which declared struct __ucontext in the scope of its
function declarations due to the naming mismatch.