From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8747 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Broer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:40:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114032708429be0522c91c4c X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445622067 9344 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2015 17:41:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:41:07 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-8760-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Oct 23 19:41:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpgKq-0002dH-51 for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:41:00 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 12274 invoked by uid 550); 23 Oct 2015 17:40:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 12256 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2015 17:40:57 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=NYa3HbEUKZ/F6INUd0r+3tqcA8lGg2kpdBryFVHIIvc=; b=qUE/Dm6uPJp7Joo2KCkPjz+UQiUiYv4CkgnZvOEx1i4cWh9sOY6F/YFrir4nBzT+Px 2yjZWmlNRKo1AGQTPeB0Glxy4QIGYkr+mdOS0YGzR9ftZ7BE1o0iHx/Zn/Z+N5Ec5j39 0rLYWpxRPg090b4k2Owdewo6HBy4jqi4xcLTRZRbBWl2ZbG47QJNkIHflLohm92vpZQT J88YjeeDs0R3q6RSDviyxnZOpS+sp9gtsDXwAnJzAaM3710ZrOpsIx/BEWN/Ia9kuvNt rycDBWRShc5YWOeoag0hMkxkUJ+Tyr1EHuZmtVMzcm+ZZjBOcq9jhflD2Ip7YLFG++MT ETYw== X-Received: by 10.107.34.149 with SMTP id i143mr26394222ioi.195.1445622045746; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 10:40:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8747 Archived-At: --001a114032708429be0522c91c4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >I think that is where we have arrived (except it's < and >= in your >expressions). Kubernetes will have to change some to satisfy the >assumed fungibility of nameservers, but it's the direction things are >almost certainly moving anyway. Hi Tim, i guess i skipped these last message - sorry. If you could clear this up for me: When there are multiple nameservers, does the musl resolver return the first response it receives regardless of it's status? So even when it is something like SERVFAIL or REFUSED it will not wait for the responses from the other nameservers that might be positive? Thanks! --001a114032708429be0522c91c4c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>I think that is where we have arrived (except it's= < and >=3D in your
>expressions).=C2=A0 Kubernetes will have t= o change some to satisfy the
>assumed fungibility of nameservers, but= it's the direction things are
>almost certainly moving anyway.

Hi Tim, i guess i skipped these last message - sorry.=

If you could clear this up for me:
When= there are multiple nameservers, does the musl resolver return the first re= sponse it receives regardless of it's status?
So even when it= is something like SERVFAIL or REFUSED it will not wait for the responses f= rom the other nameservers that might be positive?

= Thanks!
--001a114032708429be0522c91c4c--