Re: Re: Would love to see reconsideration for domain and search

[Jan Broer <jasiu.79@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1473 bytes --]

Hi Rich, i was wondering about the progress of implementing support for
'search' in resolv.conf. Is this on the road map?

Thanks!

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:

>
> I noticed in the process of trying to draft code to do this that there
> will be a lot of code duplication with the resolv.conf parsing in
> res_msend.c, and that this code has some stupid bugs (for example it
> stops parsing after it gets 3 nameservers, so it might miss options
> later in the file), so I think I'll take a look at factoring it into a
> new function to gather all the interesting information from
> resolv.conf that can be used in both places.
>
> A couple additional things I noticed from resolv.conf(5):
>
> 1. The default domain used by glibc is not the dns root but rather the
>    domain portion of the local hostname determined by gethostname().
>    Is there any value in duplicating this? Does anyone want/need it?
>
> 2. It's not clear from the documentation of "search" whether its
>    presence overrides/suppresses the "domain" (default or set by
>    resolv.conf) or adds additional searches before or after it. Which
>    should it do?
>
> While glibc/legacy behavior is worth looking at, I don't think we need
> to look at things from a standpoint of exactly duplicating that.
> Meeting real-world modern application needs while avoiding
> inconveniencing users with stupid/unwanted behavior should be the
> primary goal.
>
> Rich
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1994 bytes --]