From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 26875 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2021 21:17:48 -0000
Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Apr 2021 21:17:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 9216 invoked by uid 550); 10 Apr 2021 21:17:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 8168 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2021 21:17:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=z4gMUxssMNBnPZtgtx7NC7WRTD7BhBz2lpf/FclFjzo=;
        b=UcpKafNSNbczqSjOEzVdJEPqSMdeMCajiUIv28u9w/UXjTDK5FMM0scmlO7IDYlD6i
         D1SeJYNfyFq2iKy+wN432yy30Yg8bf0ukhvFEboeCxeDMOpL+M2Ncj43EUAiD/mOq9i4
         gIGbaL7kfhszVXtoV8FB0I/QYWzfenJd+iz+3cX5ZAQja5pxKmiuzRUnJVmgqYUtnJaF
         xEhP5m2JcZHe/xHgOfQzcTbuXySXtgtEM0QjiF31TUtEze9/ccCsWUF0sXFD79Pxx8sR
         U4jh7XkexBE4AEAcwFhIbMOeRmrgklvBBJeJWijkC5/8IgOLU+bNJ3V70hRS8C1gLqOf
         IbKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=z4gMUxssMNBnPZtgtx7NC7WRTD7BhBz2lpf/FclFjzo=;
        b=BC3zBdnW4KSrwbXld0AfQWLE8yQAp3LNZ5ncLOIhasX2zDxD8p09j441Mw9veq6zo2
         HGYA1r39mRMQTRzQbnXJPZmJOLoGe/8tlx5japZWOf/dRuid+6DVfKEzZiffM9QjIzFZ
         I/Y8n39e78lhv+MO+aQseTl/ouAhtdTKtZ8xIJtST5FVJhqXzk6d8KY94/vfVtGIinqM
         PomY3dKBgnlYVdYdktYIN+5g8Mr4Sww0eyegkERpfKgHSTds6lWFrMbufLG1v9xC87VW
         yQOmONTUWfq0I4eJAYuZsdqfpoy32PA/UfM7MdU1isMrjUH8T8KqEv4VpmohlcsZ4KdQ
         yHnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530QEJZ0v+LpaMqEzxkTlaLjjJYc+5K3CnFayZvYEng1R8mN9WUv
	mndoFqG0y0N+ile5Swb3Tt4/319n5t+A5/R4oMWihuJc
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwTBw7q6ekp0e4/Lfef3BAD6JNMFPtZ1X+q4npPMYdmSfDnhbs3l5hv3Tc4CKKiKVXnpxSWoNePytG1EeLPjBc=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d092:: with SMTP id h18mr347500ilh.62.1618089451061;
 Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+fZqCXMS6tna9j1BrSc4u+R0jeYmE7MbZS3JKubO6mgBHdBzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210410122449.GH2799122@port70.net>
In-Reply-To: <20210410122449.GH2799122@port70.net>
From: ardi <ardillasdelmonte@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 23:17:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+fZqCVAeYZidYee-rxiQrncO8R5yzKH__8UxzJPBArFsLniZg@mail.gmail.com>
To: ardi <ardillasdelmonte@gmail.com>, musl@lists.openwall.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [musl] Linux distribution for using RISC-V musl?

Really useful!! Thanks a lot!

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 2:24 PM Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> wrote:
>
> * ardi <ardillasdelmonte@gmail.com> [2021-04-10 14:08:31 +0200]:
> > Also, I've read that QEMU is able to emulate multicore RISC-V CPUs.
> > Does musl support multicore RISC-V in 64bit? I mean, if I configure a
> > multicore RISC-V in QEMU and I try to build a parallel loop using
> > OpenMP for example, will such loop be parallelized if I'm using musl?
>
> yes.
>
> this has not much to do with the libc though.
> openmp uses pthreads, pthreads uses clone and
> clone is implemented by the os in some way.
> whether things are parallel is not in the hands
> of the libc and the logic is not target dependent,
> the libc works the same way on x86_64 as on riscv.
> there can be target specific synchronization bugs
> in the libc, but those are just bugs.
>