Hi,
I noticed that musl's strtol function allows a base of 1 by parsing strings of only zeros. With all other bases less than 0 or greater than 36, strtol fails and sets errno to EINVAL.
Is this an oversight?
Not that it especially *matters*, but my guess is that the behavior isn't POSIX conforming:
- POSIX defines valid "subject sequences" for bases of 0 and 2-36.
- "In other than the C or POSIX locale, additional locale-specific subject sequence forms may be accepted."
In the C locale, musl is accepting a subject sequence of all zeroes, which POSIX doesn't define for a base of 1.
e.g.:
#include <errno.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
int main() {
errno = 0;
char *endptr = "unset";
long val = strtol(" 0001", &endptr, 1);
printf("errno=[%s], val=%ld, endptr=[%s]\n",
strerror(errno), val, endptr ? endptr : "(null)");
return 0;
}
$ gcc test.c && ./a.out
errno=[Invalid argument], val=0, endptr=[unset]
$ musl-gcc test.c && ./a.out
errno=[No error information], val=0, endptr=[1]
-Ryan