I am the developer Isaac was talking about.

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> wrote:

Are you sure it really _needs_ them? They seem to be mostly
optimizations to avoid walking uninteresing parts of the tree, and it
should be possible to achieve the same behavior (aside from time
wasted walking uninteresting stuff) with minor changes to the callback
function...

You are right that they are optimisations; that would be my guess too. The utilities need to scan through all directories and files on multiple filesystems - the more layer added to aufs, the worse it would be. Thus it needs any optimisation it can get. I'm not the author of aufs-utils so I can't be so sure.

Right now I managed to get it compiled with uclibc so at least the size problem is resolved in the interim, but I prefer to use musl if possible.

cheers!
James