From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9599 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masanori Ogino Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: musl without atomic instructions? Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:47:36 +0900 Message-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457826475 22645 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2016 23:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:47:55 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-9612-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Mar 13 00:47:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aetGE-0001cE-7x for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 00:47:54 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 11792 invoked by uid 550); 12 Mar 2016 23:47:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 11750 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2016 23:47:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=S9R1xM4dsd5h86xyEt5jqD311Uiv7kDa93c3GSruVwk=; b=jzwWEwcBlpf5TO3w2iryr3AmfIuqdF6c69D82Vv/TbiAz3t/GFZs+dfiHqwDjAKikR u2b2ZNZNzIG574dHsZh5iL8dA0w0BwvsXM9xbO13gxSMwHd6fZzaBboofzXqBOJHzIEC FEC+EKxrqlyk1lZEnbE0l+ibfSbuvS0CtdmapFA5iA+TMV6EOOlHxlgiTlm28w/Q6puC PtYpG14VoXzh2OKO3PG9O5p2aoSxSbS1NXXosZUkSY2UtGzp27CfhokkeXnLeDiiMpcr IFJLLkApPclYyB7+Nqfxqj8EmQE3oyzNafQ43LzGbs9TgdaMjoUlST94VX++BnVduepo jujA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to; bh=S9R1xM4dsd5h86xyEt5jqD311Uiv7kDa93c3GSruVwk=; b=Nkm4FmCPSFeowpYLYTvC0HiBE0IlCFbIyzBuscp6QtuK1iHFH+Jfk0DkEWMD1UrMyr wmXkB3oZuPVRg8MaLRuW7MeWVKRRGLIcQMHYexGaCUOKsDEpg2iIBvWGlFZyrXwdV7hF YBqx2vp0OltkU3XWti04ovQ2yh/kJy/B+2m7+l+UgQHhB6dk/BO2PSE00EvzwLGF2ray oNj0+FGjb+7U+GwbhVxZLCHBGoriKEZOAsTnNH6ORiYu3lPTwPIIzt07yYD6hubXdWr/ 1h4ObZMUXOor6465EJpKXVOMzilH7GlzF/5p5/kpXKngltO00WknZVsNmsgbLpRw7AUv OsgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKDuEv4vmyKLqKSm7YoQQTk81wRSfGHIFqzMRuiKqbDXAM4kDOQz7cBRkqCEGRJXktinzVlrmEbNsEc9g== X-Received: by 10.107.18.70 with SMTP id a67mr443926ioj.116.1457826456944; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 15:47:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Sender: masanoriogino@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Auth: dnNzcazK7XB07RYA6nXGlWEZmuA Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9599 Archived-At: Hello, While I work on my GSoC proposal, I doubt whether musl can be built without hardware atomic operation supports. Could we build musl without such instructions? If we could, what will happen with the features of musl? -- Masanori Ogino