From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9795
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Masanori Ogino <masanori.ogino@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Defining __STDC_ISO_10646__, __STDC_IEC_559__ and so on
 with musl?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:54:00 +0900
Message-ID: <CAA-4+jfG4M8kguvth1A+USqp8HhxRroUVNwW19hMrjE=L30bWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA-4+jd-Sqx-JVkfXCsoB0Sccf7BehZ=x4fUthbMiCMWZd30zQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160331143547.GP9862@port70.net>
	<878u0yln3q.fsf@gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459436083 13028 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2016 14:54:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-9808-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Mar 31 16:54:39 2016
Return-path: <musl-return-9808-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-9808-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1aldzZ-0000Uo-Fn
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:54:37 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 3634 invoked by uid 550); 31 Mar 2016 14:54:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 3561 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2016 14:54:12 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to;
        bh=GA+4dnPG7/fDkRyyqWV3ZDwdsQfaMaoGYBblfgwmFQ0=;
        b=ZROO9RPf9wP4CmmzC6lddUwoxc3b0XGa5oHg5zk+FC9iQI+p5GitMsW+1oiLy1FtP5
         ulhqelhzoIFtDa4fCzfnp3reEKAmGQ4f6wHU+pHzX9Yar+59gxSyZkFMmIL+kLMUpXIn
         MPMr0aR8mEuxKpazhONeivxq/dbhrf+ztRybO4/HmrvljlvkEOd3tlhUzHaCLhEM0EOU
         tIp+1TUcMlm3aGrU7NVflL6ic/tPQ32zbwWitKdqj1Vk+tVhV1wfpQsXW6/t0spytKm1
         xsX6qxmLWCyUhKR04npweWH7wcfxjVRJvNTORqzVvO0esyv/DbIT1e7uLTytmw5c7ODc
         rwfw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to;
        bh=GA+4dnPG7/fDkRyyqWV3ZDwdsQfaMaoGYBblfgwmFQ0=;
        b=lwYhsDhc52fQdtHpqEj48ZvT769uRwooBDcISZE4Npcwd8r8lmd9y+KGYb+Ydejf8o
         R6EUYZKaXqy2plgXLtpEQW+8gGEMb0PT/YXQ4HYg0wjR02JEA0I24BeGHYIFbO90objg
         PyDYVgSbLCSJUbFNTpLy0Ll63nc9S9j5ExE/x7Lcmxd8ElWNx/UrfUy9/DWrNmfwKXAw
         JCjcrsOFyhOhjVei1ZqKHcMcrGevPRPn6W/XpxFvctz/7afjCJev32FC0iSrh/WCTsA0
         qcoxkva6z0UZaAG+9xpCwQ/lIKWrayfdX/d5FtEvJZsMUOXvo9clD4C+yy8gDlwjry8e
         JRpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ4EN9GCYQSCHMHKjI1yzCN6drrz2wzM//E06+auxNJMeN/0URO/6jPwggTWJbLH8VomMYc7H9g3KpHXg==
X-Received: by 10.202.104.92 with SMTP id d89mr857765oic.75.1459436040977;
 Thu, 31 Mar 2016 07:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Original-Sender: masanoriogino@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <878u0yln3q.fsf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nJUWpCpiwXYy5nIuG25FGzcCyTs
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9795
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9795>

2016-03-31 23:48 GMT+09:00 Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com>:
> What about clang? I don't see similar predefined macros there.

Yes, Clang does not use stdc-predef.h unless it is included somewhere,
so there is another issue... (I also hit this problem before but
haven't written a patch yet.)

-- 
Masanori Ogino