Actually now that I read the ISO spec again, it seems to correspond to Unicode 11 :( so I think ISO/IEC 10646 has not catch up with Unicode 12 yet. Not sure what we should do in this case.On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:51 PM Eleftherios Kritikos <el01049@gmail.com> wrote:From what I read from here:and here:it seems like the latest ISO/IEC 10646 standard that most closely match Unicode 12.1.0 is ISO/IEC 10646:2017/Amd 2:2019 (fifth edition 2017, amendment 2).From what I read in the document here: https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c073773_ISO_IEC_10646_2017_Amd_2_2019%20(E).zipon first page, this amendment was made on 2019-06. So I would guess that the correct value should be:```#define __STDC_ISO_10646__ 201906L```All this with a grain of salt as this is the first time I am looking at ISO/IEC 10646.Thanks for looking into this!Regards,LefterisOn Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 2:07 PM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:56:44PM +0100, Eleftherios Kritikos wrote:
> Yes. I also created a merge request for musl-chartable-tools
> https://github.com/richfelker/musl-chartable-tools/pull/2
Thanks. stdc-predef.h also needs to be updated with a new value for
__STD_ISO_10646__. Do you know the right yyyymm value it should have
for this version of Unicode?
Rich
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019, 11:40 pm Rich Felker, <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 10:27:42PM +0100, u_quark wrote:
> > > ---
> > > src/ctype/alpha.h | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > src/ctype/nonspacing.h | 88 ++++++++++++-----------
> > > src/ctype/punct.h | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > src/ctype/wide.h | 26 +++----
> > > 4 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)
> >
> > Is this done just by dropping the new Unicode files into
> > musl-chartable-tools and running make?
> >
> > Rich
> >