Actually, answering my own question - a quick back of the packet calculation suggests about 8,500 packages in OpenBSD, vs 65,000+ for Debian - although it does depend how you count. And there are a lot more 'unofficial' Debian repos and packages, too... There's no doubt that OpenBSD includes the most popular.

On 13 February 2015 at 15:20, Raphael Cohn <raphael.cohn@stormmq.com> wrote:
Do they use a third party support lib?

If it's possible to support use cases with a third party lib, then I'm less concerned - provided that that lib also works with musl. Given the nature of ucontext, that may not be so. A musl native solution would be optimal for performance - and performance is a common reason for going down this route. It allows for far greater scale in certain server designs then either thread-per-connection or a thread-pool can do.

Out of interest, how many packages are in the OpenBSD repository? How does it compare to Debian's, say? For me, Debian's repo contents is a yardstick of what Linux + Musl could be expected to work with.


On 13 February 2015 at 15:08, Anthony J. Bentley <anthony@cathet.us> wrote:
Raphael Cohn writes:
> Is there any possibility of adding in the ucontext.h functions? I know
> they're deprecated, but they're still widely used - particularly by go for
> goroutines, IIRC.

It's worth mentioning that OpenBSD doesn't have ucontext, so given the
size of its package repository (which also contains Go), ucontext can't
be *that* widely used.

--
Anthony J. Bentley