From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/14529 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Gohman Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: new exp fails erfc in libc-test Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:15:40 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20190808014606.GE9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005c9ab8058f9adbbe" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="126215"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-14545-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 08 15:16:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hviH2-000Wju-EA for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 15:16:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21644 invoked by uid 550); 8 Aug 2019 13:16:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 21626 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2019 13:16:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WkHYGtQ8o3kopDaFO27KaQ1mpheHS0lZeU9oqrXNrZU=; b=AoYFP4G4cTk4QtQkM/oGvM6un/Ht/hP9FyEqjRkrwHgK1RfFfdW/w30GO54Ga5jZpp HliVJGtFvvOfsoaFJHUESAIfG/5xQPe7aUcAUpMDoFPyrgY7mOxKMqGjrk1csuumcuhC VhX1j9ZDLzr+dbvO9tMxZKkC4P5riCAm0yiNM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WkHYGtQ8o3kopDaFO27KaQ1mpheHS0lZeU9oqrXNrZU=; b=OI6BCG0LhEij+2CvMnl8qECm+MqwwGnZgHr1ZEjSi9kKuWQBcuOyLaoQ12WDaXQa3W CjDBLJJ8awLk/GSx1RkOoX+x0wuzDseRcKuS300BMZWSA+RLKDcFbWtqgZCXiEOKPYZA 97yNGwL9spO3RCQRSZsvOZI7JcbHo4lQM3zMeqQwd9CixOo6WxTakxhvkXpsmcXreyKe vqEL2tKkRnHnqAPO+5/3NmY/9J9/vnxGpSizhmek3xRMYQsfHHZjXax6UPbErUvjjW8g /BDNK9DAhJ2lW6fKXTZPN6ojJnmC+wxJkiA9LTBpWKs2ms5xD4yHUjKBA/kuGNNPipkp hAHA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlM5aZtF4RxqsbYKp6EiRGmz1L7sioaFIfJjv0Lw9O4peOv9k5 BfG8o1Oafh92v+TXSriFITGVJF+Pczo1F+qqGy2twrP6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw98axwwjPMaw5Lv2+allBqt3oiQ33CdMDbPnztzM2SOUmb/fOWxVRp7VC0nnYlOQjvhAW2WUXUquliL2+gpMs= X-Received: by 2002:a02:c492:: with SMTP id t18mr16701590jam.67.1565270151559; Thu, 08 Aug 2019 06:15:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20190808014606.GE9017@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:14529 Archived-At: --0000000000005c9ab8058f9adbbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:46 PM Rich Felker wrote: > I think errors on this order of magnitude are considered normal for > the transcendental functions. Is there something you're concerned will > break due to the difference in accuracy here, or are you asking if > it's potentially something you should be concerned about? > I'm just reporting a nominal regression I observed. If the finding is the test is too narrow, that's fine with me. Dan --0000000000005c9ab8058f9adbbe Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:46 PM Rich Felke= r <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
=
I think errors on this order of magnitude are considered normal for
the transcendental functions. Is there something you're concerned will<= br> break due to the difference in accuracy here, or are you asking if
it's potentially something you should be concerned about?

I'm just reporting a nominal regression I observ= ed. If the finding is the test is too narrow, that's fine with me.
<= /div>

Dan

--0000000000005c9ab8058f9adbbe--