> -fuse-ld=lld I actually used -fuse-ld=ld.lld That did the trick, but has unlocked another error ld.lld: error: unable to find library -lgcc ld.lld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_eh I thought musl compiles with it's own headers? On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:54 PM Nagakamira wrote: > -fuse-ld=lld > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2021, 3:26 AM Jeffrey Walton wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:55 PM Matt Andrews >> wrote: >> > >> > >> How do I specify which linker to use? >> > > >> > >LD. Also see >> https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Implicit-Variables.html >> . >> > >> > Looking at the ./configure for musl (which is not based on autoconf >> according to the docs), there is no mention of LD. Setting LD for >> ./configure and/or the call to make still results in the error. >> > >> > Who calls the linker? The compiler or make? Shouldn't clang know where >> it's linker is? How to tell clang which linker to use? >> >> You can have the compiler driver call the linker for you by specifying >> -o with an output file name. In that case, $CC or $CXX will drive the >> link. And in this case, your LDFLAGS should prefix options with -Wl to >> tell the compiler driver the option is for the linker. >> >> Jeff >> >