From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7598 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?572X5YuH5YiaKFlvbmdnYW5nIEx1bykg?= Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl, Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 23:23:28 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20150508080122.GC29035@port70.net> <20150508083641.GD29035@port70.net> <20150508124942.GV17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150508133545.GW17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150508141013.GX17573@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20150508152045.GE29035@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431098644 17091 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2015 15:24:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:24:04 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-7611-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri May 08 17:24:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqk8A-0001HN-Hz for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 17:24:02 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11670 invoked by uid 550); 8 May 2015 15:24:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11652 invoked from network); 8 May 2015 15:24:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+Fob804sk54O14DHl16rPWTW3ieFb9DOHgd1biVIRK4=; b=oGgEZSk7QMWno6DqTvgvTbFOJtV4VtRPjSI/oMwq0SRkRXPlNNLmp7Ef6jlVnETw48 wZImhv9D28op3CpUdmym2rIQ8roxd1P78hR07iyLUEL/taCaUSO42hos5WhbDz/LTiHA RZKt7K8mdEunED7IGzlOsWEiaLzfTOU/D6+m9m3bNWODSBprLgV0hnspTfYEkE3TV5zi vfBRRlLEXF0E6GuHWHd4tdt+GCTVFIQqv/F8owjFegf75j7spfWsREsIiFD+w6d+uRdE 3jkK38UN615w7TibOyuPc8VlHSyVrqHT8YkUEk1WUV68Ap8axaB7NKNf4hwvWwtmJobl hzdA== X-Received: by 10.107.10.201 with SMTP id 70mr5780588iok.0.1431098628617; Fri, 08 May 2015 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150508152045.GE29035@port70.net> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7598 Archived-At: Yeap, using wchar_t always intent for platform-compatible, not used for cross-platform developing. that's the relationship between int32_t and int. int32_t is cross-platform and int is not. 2015-05-08 23:20 GMT+08:00 Szabolcs Nagy : > * ?????????(Yonggang Luo) [2015-05-08 22:17:58 += 0800]: >> solution, I think there is no one would use >> wchar_t for cross text processing, cause, on some system, wchar_t is >> just 8bit width! > > anybody would use wchar_t who cares about standard conformant > implementations. > > non-standard broken platforms may get an unmaintained #ifdef > as usual.. --=20 =E6=AD=A4=E8=87=B4 =E7=A4=BC =E7=BD=97=E5=8B=87=E5=88=9A Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo