From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7586
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?B?572X5YuH5YiaKFlvbmdnYW5nIEx1bykg?= <luoyonggang@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: There is no tests for musl,
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 16:03:20 +0800
Message-ID: <CAE2XoE_q8Y7Ef2BAD3+d+g8bMzWtH3zXm4mpQ1-+USfOP7yiKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAE2XoE9kDjO90oDwN6eS6+bvf=Ld0n4Yux+9m78BmD9ULDExwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20150508080122.GC29035@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1431072249 29809 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2015 08:04:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 08:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-7599-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri May 08 10:04:02 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-7599-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-7599-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1YqdGE-0004TH-P5
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 10:03:54 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1824 invoked by uid 550); 8 May 2015 08:03:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1806 invoked from network); 8 May 2015 08:03:52 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=1NAoXVdMfHLP5YkPBjo9jAFKsor33vtxyKL28jGI3sM=;
        b=sqJLq925wRXAedpcPEAqWUXfTh6Udl0kvmJ31gqW08UvCc1zIr2CfkxX3MUIyow1sX
         Dp0NQZCI/nuCZYwwSmS153uXZ2qMparPNvEGC5TIrTxG95JetHHXSgNUNOmyky7hBAzq
         liGTSdj4Hp9+PfJFLbmNvyFRvNpFzr4e207RLcBxfVXU5mqN0I12SXhs8rrJ/+uPm2wf
         40FiU5SazrcnB461uxzGqwAXiK3Ir5QQA9dLIox0C+zi0OkkjdtRJjaNAlqcNIEtdGC9
         5UeNXnrsEk7VUmHcltbhgg4Do3LVA4ROOSg74CPR4sWjXXKf6GbC0jhj04HGBf/dzD98
         45fg==
X-Received: by 10.43.133.137 with SMTP id hy9mr2723557icc.74.1431072220993;
 Fri, 08 May 2015 01:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150508080122.GC29035@port70.net>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:7586
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/7586>

Understood, Indeed, I wanna to port musl to win32, doesn't know if
that's was a good idea.

2015-05-08 16:01 GMT+08:00 Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>:
> * ?????????(Yonggang Luo)  <luoyonggang@gmail.com> [2015-05-08 15:38:33 +=
0800]:
>> That's really not so good for the stable.
>>
>
> it is a good thing
>
> a libc should provide portable semantics so implementation
> independent tests should be used not "tests for musl"
>
> http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Libc-Test



--=20
         =E6=AD=A4=E8=87=B4
=E7=A4=BC
=E7=BD=97=E5=8B=87=E5=88=9A
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo