From: "dgutson ." <danielgutson@gmail.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: #define __MUSL__ in features.h
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:37:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFdMc-0Eaq+syEvdOMQk7Y6eQA7zkfn2fhxXogjkkd7c3Tas2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315193244.GK1436@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2709 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:32 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 04:02:03PM -0300, Martin Galvan wrote:
> > 2018-03-15 15:53 GMT-03:00 Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>:
> > > In any case it's not a bug in musl. The code is perfectly valid C. If
> > > the compiler is producing a warning for it, either ignore it or ask
> > > the compiler to stop.
> >
> > Just because some code is valid C, it doesn't mean it's not buggy.
>
> It's valid C that does exactly what it's intended to do.
>
> > >> The compiler warnings aren't being wrongly produced. musl will indeed
> > >> perform a signed-to-unsigned conversion here.
> > >
> > > Because that's how the C language works.
> >
> > Yes. And gcc has checks to try and make up for C's weak typing.
> >
> > While your definition of "bug" is debatable, IMHO if a commonly used
> > option causes application builds to break due to some library, the
> > library has a usability issue. The issue is even bigger when we're
> > talking about something as core as the standard C library.
>
> Perhaps this should be documented more explicitly, but there is no
> guarantee that building with -Werror[=anything except warnings which
> are constraint violations in C] will succeed, especially when GCC is
> not honoring its usual promise not to produce warnings for code
> expanded from macros from -isystem paths. I did just test and indeed
> the warning is produced with gcc 6.3.0.
>
> > >> So whenever we find a bug on musl we should just stop all our
> > >> development until you've fixed the bug?
> > >
> > > No. As noted above, if you need to support systems that might have bug
> > > X, you write a test (configure-time or run-time as appropriate) to
> > > detect bug X and handle it.
> >
> > Precisely, and __MUSL__ would be really useful for this.
>
> Absolutely not. __MUSL__ would not tell you anything about whether bug
> X is present. It would facilitate permanently assuming "musl has bug
> X" because you observed bug X on musl at one point in the past.
>
Then turn __MUSL__ a number holding the version, as in cplusplus, etc, so
people can do
#if __MUSL__ < someversion
#endif
and it will be clear what happens and will solve the chronology issue.
>
> FWIW, mixing these two issues in one thread is not very productive.
> The warning issue is separate and should be discussed on its own.
>
> Rich
>
--
Who’s got the sweetest disposition?
One guess, that’s who?
Who’d never, ever start an argument?
Who never shows a bit of temperament?
Who's never wrong but always right?
Who'd never dream of starting a fight?
Who get stuck with all the bad luck?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3775 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-15 15:55 dgutson .
2018-03-15 18:39 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 18:48 ` Martin Galvan
2018-03-15 18:53 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 19:00 ` dgutson .
2018-03-15 19:13 ` dgutson .
2018-03-15 19:42 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 20:16 ` u-uy74
2018-03-15 20:44 ` u-uy74
2018-03-15 19:37 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 19:42 ` dgutson .
2018-03-15 19:02 ` Martin Galvan
2018-03-15 19:32 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 19:37 ` dgutson . [this message]
2018-03-15 19:43 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 19:52 ` dgutson .
2018-03-15 21:46 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-03-15 22:38 ` Rich Felker
2018-03-15 18:51 ` dgutson .
2018-03-15 21:06 ` Markus Wichmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFdMc-0Eaq+syEvdOMQk7Y6eQA7zkfn2fhxXogjkkd7c3Tas2g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=danielgutson@gmail.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).