On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:23:12PM -0300, dgutson . wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>
> > The OpenBSD catan implementation we're using has a number of
> > nonsensical "overflow" (goto ovrf) conditions that aren't errors,
> > reported by mepholic on irc. I think the attached patch fixes them
> > without introducing new problems, but I'm not sure if any other
> > problems remain.
> >
> > Note that, of the three cases removed:
> >
> > 1. Is not an exceptional case at all, and made no sense to begin with.
> >
> > 2. Is only exceptional if x and a are both zero; atan(2x,0) is
> >    perfectly well-defined.
> >
> > 3. Is only possible if y==1.0 and x==0.0, which is the only real
> >    exceptional case for atan: z==I.
> >
>
>
> Besides the trigonometric case, are you considering de-normalized numbers,
> such as 4.94066e-324 as divisor?
> For example:
>     double x = 1.0;
>     double y = 5E-324;
> x / y is inf, and y != 0.0.
> Shouldn't 'a' be checked against that number or its absolute value >=
> minimum?

Can you clarify where you think something goes wrong?

-	if (a == 0.0)
-		goto ovrf;
 
 	t = y + 1.0;
 	a = (x2 + t * t)/a;

The check you removed does not look correct for me because what I mentioned.
However, shouldn't you check, before the division, that a is not the nearest to zero (+ or -) denormalized representable double,
in order to avoid ending in inf?

 

Rich



--
Who’s got the sweetest disposition?
One guess, that’s who?
Who’d never, ever start an argument?
Who never shows a bit of temperament?
Who's never wrong but always right?
Who'd never dream of starting a fight?
Who get stuck with all the bad luck?