Did you intentionally remove the : in the label?
If not, does this assembly without errors? How did you test this?
@@ -49,7 +52,8 @@ feclearexcept:
.global feraiseexcept
.type feraiseexcept,@function
-feraiseexcept:
+feraiseexcept
+ ENDBRANCH32
These patches were a result from some experiment I have been running
with clang, and to which I needed a suitable library. I understand that
the patches were not in their best shape, and I was a bit busy at the
time so I didn't really push this through.
Either way, I'm now wondering if there is any interest from MUSL to
support CET. If yes, I can start working on an updated patch-set to be
sent here eventually.
Additionally, if the support is of interest, it would also be
interesting to know if MUSL intends to support CET as specified in the
X86-64 ABI (where a single linked DSO without the CET bits set disables
the feature) or if you have something different in mind.
Tks,
Joao.