Sorry, but my understanding is that r272662 is correct for x86, no?

We can definitely add support for more arches with musl if someone sends a
patch to the list.

Cheers,
Rafael
On Jun 14, 2016 11:04 AM, "Szabolcs Nagy" <nsz@port70.net> wrote:

> * Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> [2016-06-14 07:43:34 -0700]:
> > On Jun 5, 2016 6:47 PM, "Lei Zhang" <zhanglei.april@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > One of the changes involved is to tell clang where to find musl's
> > > dynamic linker. My question is: is musl's dynamic linker always named
> > > "ld-musl-$ARCH.so.1" and put under /lib?
> >
> > There is a llvm clang patch for this already. Look at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/tree/master/recipes-devtools/clang/clang
>
> i think these should be upstreamed into clang and
> the recent r272662 clang commit should be reverted
> and the existing mips musl hacks should be fixed too.
>