From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10602 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: John Mudd Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: 32 bit musl? Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 10:29:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143d30041366d053e6f7832 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476023382 26754 195.159.176.226 (9 Oct 2016 14:29:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 14:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Mudd To: musl Original-X-From: musl-return-10615-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Oct 09 16:29:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1btF6f-0006Ho-1P for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 16:29:37 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 26121 invoked by uid 550); 9 Oct 2016 14:29:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 26085 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2016 14:29:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=mAzY9JChEKZvDNbh3NeuEXcDYeWEbh7Mdx0lJIz2I1M=; b=bDlk3nUpho02dN9XOICPQkfo69nODbV92xlfxqtEVr00X078wm/+RVojOmOGC7MVEj qqKNnMIn+mGcJeDNxzqN+FQGMD76sBhJbgviTuVV5r7C8IN5nqCXxPQfnfvOfU91YgY9 2emK6kCouJvdXX5M5T5L+zbEcOBEcn//NlUujVoMT8u5fs5Y/Msji8SFfdUdzpxB9C9x YCsS3TbZucRJbvT5R7ppU5G0qoSokpZNG1HJJ19PK+tl+mHTU6Fs6OU0AEpTIdw3jpq3 eGWshvKf2VOCo70YrasvRBIsdTBS9whwyATgEycYPXWopcMx6NoKN1s10cb2FDj30HLL vv3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mAzY9JChEKZvDNbh3NeuEXcDYeWEbh7Mdx0lJIz2I1M=; b=MLf9GkF1VTmk88JrFACYwMdnyuYAH+65Z4Pl1oA2Tsnrsa2m44t6y7uFSQTzLauVKU pLCbQw+tYp91dm0WlfNSInVpFhI1IAVsED8stByjHrGvI/BT7/eum4Z5xQNdHX4R4tPb VskvYApMf5HqrcTE78x1dl9ipWfVUQ1PNNbr/91PZP3SsQ7Klylhy9zIwAjubNHUDldl V0QotxmzJbNFbCwh86bWdNgazOlHT4z1QRFtBlKDYl9cD81ZRpLXyHL3cOyMmmfs6Nc/ XcnZCRbvNjVtjGNf7PEBuGdoTVZmg13+D/EidqTydPYQBY+psyea0z9HgNQoKBjsyxyH BLNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RmmOBWWYXWHisiWXb+NXHTvJc3+LCyWzsq3ojlltANwocqnYQZ8bVhoe8DzJNMwuUXegsMzNi0AYkf6Cg== X-Received: by 10.55.198.85 with SMTP id b82mr26087327qkj.171.1476023363382; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 07:29:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10602 Archived-At: --001a1143d30041366d053e6f7832 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd wrote: > Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use musl libs. It > kills two birds with one stone. That's great. > > But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for dynamically > linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a way I can > override this? > > Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on my development machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable access to root user when I deploy for production. --001a1143d30041366d053e6f7832 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 9:55 PM, John Mudd <johnbmudd@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:
Rich's musl-cross-make builds 32-bit executables that use m= usl libs. It kills two birds with one stone. That's great.
But it appears to expect musl libc to be installed in /lib for = dynamically linked executables. That's not an option for me. Is there a= way I can override this?


Thanks Laurent, I used symbolic link in /lib for testing on= my development machine. That works well. But I don't have reasonable a= ccess to root user when I deploy for production.
--001a1143d30041366d053e6f7832--