From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with SMTP id c5a0a847 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 20:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20099 invoked by uid 550); 14 Feb 2020 20:51:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 20081 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2020 20:51:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mforney-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WiPdDn33YR/6oC0l13zXs3AZGWAhHaspyIvf+26CVa0=; b=H7STjkG4C4B22anM0o4xa2xyqAiwCUyBTMMSrDtfH69Ld9hQcNQkyLhpSzoFbS1h2w hl12HXhF+q5ySYD4x5cjBoaZmfHJCn0K3CXFlShE16ToslCjPJ4OGwrW7AxT2QmzbRoT KUi4POcoAMFsS+qkJVZBkXYgLw66OLYN97a9xEMKpMIg+mp3ewlkT7I6DsWd2tu0ww8r oZGX2CtaUBBVzKC21dWGiKNAK/aoxeAa5tuHW7CD8zhYVuIKSjMA3EwwvnWDPTi5/uL6 NeYH8dA8Rh1HFClLNwk/1l4AO/g5DJq8xY2pwQ1YhJVHeV8saf0zHfKURd4zcvb6GRwZ CC3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WiPdDn33YR/6oC0l13zXs3AZGWAhHaspyIvf+26CVa0=; b=R14t9uPCWU1nW4qmqZ5a9k5U5ZWbZFISrVx+9ldAufkb9mYzYBPiJK8mY2uotUuaSY li0dJR46HjroqbgKUueTz4WwUB0Ajn+iSQJnFeptdnLVGQbY190XgTD6of6VMovPln/M 58xBvJenN88YsPXsckgEINafet2ZYSTbTKp1qL+QWMjz8qdwse1rCbxGAc30KTFmOc7q KveO/3vgU5MRfqTIDTha8rjcFrOEn3ajGghvREtNcDMomxk0+imfAI4Cx2jcQF81AtRA 45JxxSf5NPWeP2rPdKUsyY+9eiEBuLdVHbgoCECP06I0sEIXTccW4uCvY1K+5ybjJ8jp QFew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdQHklsEvOCbOT8ODIh+L+cy9y6RdwpGdkP0sIVOszMyPPWsj7 W+CVGsJumSC7LwNz4RhGDwLIbk51mAVOIau/QaUezb+qpvY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJ7IK7txlU439S2btOVUBn9TqjT4svAvgwOyu59prjiLjdCw0LDhX/7DugQCp+4bf1YakMVG19Rp6BUEu52sc= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9e13:: with SMTP id h19mr6646151wme.21.1581713485934; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:51:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [73.70.188.119] In-Reply-To: References: From: Michael Forney Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:51:25 -0800 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [musl] Musl gentoo development: browsers Recently, I've been spending some time writing upstreamable patches for long standing musl incompatibilities in Firefox (and the parts it imports from chromium), and pushing to get them fixed finally. So far, I've had some good success: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1acc873aa118 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/660da1ec99c0 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3ec8c96f4d53 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7c6f9f854cfc https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a3096ca24124 All but the last one should be available in the next Firefox release (74). I believe the last remaining remaining issue is usage of getcontext in tools/profiler. I've just filed a bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615713. I have a couple ideas for a fix (outlined in that bug), but haven't written a patch yet. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know! In one of the reviews, the reviewer mentioned about the existence of build target support tiers: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Supported_build_configurations I was thinking that once Firefox can build with musl out of the box, it would be really great to see if we can get Mozilla to consider musl to be a Tier 3 target (at least x86_64), so we can avoid any musl regressions in the future. -Michael