From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 2344 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2023 18:19:15 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Oct 2023 18:19:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 6054 invoked by uid 550); 20 Oct 2023 18:19:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 6004 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2023 18:19:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google-2018; t=1697825936; x=1698430736; darn=lists.openwall.com; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i0YB2lO1B3Dhb3t+xXqR8k+NFRQYQc8kV0tcj33vjrs=; b=bLAq1g+msnE613neDk3TbTFdK3IzNumg3LXxVh/6OMGby3Y7fEB6HtamtZGrjP0bPr egE2XwE2uCLBnzXk5/9EzaTo/IYUgHN8BCInuz3A1PQWbDr4XD6x/Rz98AfsJS+Ozb7n x8QGwuqJzMtzgmf5AUYZ6254FMB49QFLwTWxVhFCw9D8ESYaEytMFcy+5KJZ+NlOggw5 zWT3STTuVj34ykHiPVonC9pUuU+TS7cKN6Gw6z1jqvTWX2BN3wptPmy0X7YN/njjcrKM Di4mVr/6HowRvrq78HUz4m6GkUyxc/HwOGdHw8nfrdqaWUOE03ttjTqRhPlHC26bjXjt 8IRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697825936; x=1698430736; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=i0YB2lO1B3Dhb3t+xXqR8k+NFRQYQc8kV0tcj33vjrs=; b=q69NtHNnSCLkH8SUJdC0tyJtORog1PFGCPT44SNwWq4cjkTox1bDRwJBu7FZNAfISD /vXibRAUnDnNEDGfkzJlbF1dN/J79Iolmb3ClegTD7TVQMQ6Z1hltOxni4lLakHJaFJ0 N4sXGPXIQjNgBx9wMfnHn/CU/sXWncDejvHKENMlxJHQJQD13W5/gjE1z4gS+v31SOiy dS/7DDMnIq5wXqmXcFDdSh4Afj+rl22wvKltJqCppV2ICNBkwm1t8/rdgPmpHF/xr4My ltiZshLM7fYYBxjJ//UxqT8jXzQGIgKB6WosbrV7f4nsUil3TzkRammxYLzJjbnJ9TMf ibZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw4zV4lSVZNSWJPf77Qo7j0Gk9EhAIC+XzOPOAMEPVOMCkv2v0T c3DvZN68r0d0mweLU/tuG8Q4xSkWfLmyMY/SW/mZ9oGpy2/mn+OallnG0w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGS78sysjC5Ey2or9E9wPh4cykvCF2qW8W3Bnu+OE83EDIOpuTQq7cMBTHcULl6aUXI4D0OjQA1y8P563rfS7Y= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d80e:b0:27d:568b:a741 with SMTP id a14-20020a17090ad80e00b0027d568ba741mr2647290pjv.41.1697825936147; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:18:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Farid Zakaria Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 11:18:44 -0700 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [musl] dynlink.c tests What's the best way to test dynlink.c ? I'm making some small changes (actually just simplifying it by removing some code for unneeded arch like DL_FDPIC) but would like to make sure I didn't bork anything. I found https://wiki.musl-libc.org/writing-tests but that seems focused strictly on the libc itself. Is there a dynamic-loader test suite anyone is familiar with ?