From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RDNS_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 19338 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 16:31:31 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (mother.openwall.net: domain of lists.openwall.com designates 195.42.179.200 as permitted sender) receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=195.42.179.200 envelope-from= Received: from unknown (HELO mother.openwall.net) (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2020 16:31:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 6084 invoked by uid 550); 14 Mar 2020 16:31:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 6066 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 16:31:26 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bHxP3D+kd8bu4fQ4i8TLPEYzx90ULqx63ychxHNlWs=; b=ui11CPQah6tCuoR43pg7/ogzLEc3wnsJ4Yd+KXaXM5DsRssuTqX9xzSRq2eqBS/oas Gu2Qxw05gSmGpOSI9ZaRtYisH7VhB0Hv8SBlzGHvEGKelUcrY2zYcCDcwekbhKa1k2uc vaJrXCpHqb+HvY550DtJ9vW79hR0mUSTs45DeHDPq3OMweL2aNw52klTAkUgrX+OwLa/ 10mzKh4s2rL4eRs6wljUBuFP23aOHTwHyLsJvhKI/rqOOP9ZsMLUq+AXGi5ReNbpXv9c 6ZU9hmwJkkyXoGC0Li5kXvGKzTW19D8Vr6V/dFenvkZvmW8rzp8ogmWX2+rTk1EbLJAp 8Z4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2bHxP3D+kd8bu4fQ4i8TLPEYzx90ULqx63ychxHNlWs=; b=oZpCenGr+4z+XCvfQt8SEMAD9TQMooHCQkQ21hFDOgSbvxSo7481enkC1LuS/iT2a2 LpQXtswY+QNDvuZL6MQhq4d86vKvxykdZ19ks5WTtZkBDoGzK2sHWW1T2jaFARNoK3A2 VFFqmqcCqpWLsnnJM/quFumoRA8dDz/fkgfemR/XOrJH4mzMm5s9FfDR7feHQT/mLEw7 aYPRuv3OxGzfnWuvC3CxLF+VcWyZDE4A4ms7FvF4FqXwaOCwoKThF4wFggTPstwEMcH6 AdhqumozfHDBNGgs1b5DIvKiAiKRZqn5xlvmObfJaRCnNul+Y//WCwcsay17ZpICJQQd C5og== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3R4WpbhlGE7C+905Gz3CV4cDoDd59NwhmqpKQ9dzgIY8svU8nb PQbU2ImB7P6SI+nQDToqmS8wl5rONt85wuKuWW1efwQP X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvzTOk5aAEbAewISB1+Fw/EYHE9zhBxmGzivAiKxtATRsbDI+wbCsbB2rzDIT6T/t7wYndmbPVB2o4Ix2NcFJM= X-Received: by 2002:a92:2904:: with SMTP id l4mr20300091ilg.166.1584203474063; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:31:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200313214648.2qqr5utzyqy5ewsu@wolfsden.cz> <871rpvny3b.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20200314145410.GP11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20200314145410.GP11469@brightrain.aerifal.cx> From: Jeffrey Walton Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 12:31:03 -0400 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [musl] Proposal to match behaviour of gethostbyname to glibc On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 10:54 AM Rich Felker wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 09:24:08AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Wolf: > > ... > > But something has to scan the entire file in =E2=80=9Cmulti on=E2=80=9D= mode at least, > > to find all relevant addresses. > > musl doesn't use/support host.conf, so "multi on" isn't an issue for > us at present. > > BTW it's not clear to me how the canonical name would/should be > determined in this example if you allow multiple hits. Perhaps DHCP domain-search option? Jeff