From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RDNS_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 24649 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 17:17:17 -0000 Received-SPF: pass (mother.openwall.net: domain of lists.openwall.com designates 195.42.179.200 as permitted sender) receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=195.42.179.200 envelope-from= Received: from unknown (HELO mother.openwall.net) (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2020 17:17:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 27816 invoked by uid 550); 14 Mar 2020 17:17:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 27795 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2020 17:17:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lA/ssd/ddKXWbrcmmDhjHJhAEF+Zo+cPnkRPsbutKe4=; b=NKBAfVgo/cXKANEHHRKGWqhCGBPstxH8hhh9+4uzfJTdx0uGwUjrqOWHsVsdOXJw/h Nw6/UDIc0EehJuZQ6SC24MI8nUnwWcTjqfdoT++KA6kmWJAZS9XaBFvLV5+7RemVgqay Nj6xh6XZTT5SYqBBGflwqIIAGzppuylBFUIVkpW7L5gEqm+fuX2UDXRJSBZhZA1XDC79 QfC+m52BfN4dXQiP231l7D0DHt3e1beZMqGhFO1Xl+tCmpMJCWrA733ByDBnevlrj6YH 2Tgj/4zeE3PZTUkQ+sxZnl/cM1O9HyZjHyOPLRwB7+eicODAcg3HWlSsFvaBD5RO0lv4 F2iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=lA/ssd/ddKXWbrcmmDhjHJhAEF+Zo+cPnkRPsbutKe4=; b=T0Sr2CmQJ9Av63RQQirfr5+YTJXMHHVtNd1OtGkzFl7ACqesFIknF80iaFLm56d4RY XkxoJm/r5sdCYoS4NGR3ddzmjBB1HVbqQ39YW0PkpqcKeI9SYNHW+zvRE4l8ENmsyr9o 9VortnQDUWIjnrVF0Zq1Z0NUhlRo4rIVZzhocem/bTW7JBQd01tqpzLHOthFIQWViTuv HomLZPu828+mlqDrrMnz+Xs671yiZXtkg8CLMQbF/HjfIn9lZUX5RxeZYZoAJGnT4hBD QBOFFJTr1ufPf+3UwIgz5PX4iQhlptNJBGAyS5NNlm2pqJ/QbfEWjDMHpxOmG1JUgU9f C6Mg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0U81P+rB3BebdfUzsFKCCDi2xtf77LctM+hzBDeHJB161RYY84 RCYOcoD9emjX+HVb0ZgqPNvaSZK/VOcIt0cwbdT4BQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsW1nTM6/lGcjDjN5Ea8vzXzzOKPZDQENxo0dFk6iUOaq6WFdo0B0tJnQU27CuX82/AfqeHzb1WuZWQEd7Qbqo= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d50f:: with SMTP id m15mr10836583oig.19.1584206218569; Sat, 14 Mar 2020 10:16:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Reini Urban Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:16:50 +0100 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e8aeb705a0d3c0f2" Subject: Re: [musl] Advocating musl to the chromium OS developers --000000000000e8aeb705a0d3c0f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian Peregrine schrieb am Sa., 14. M=C3=A4rz 20= 20, 18:05: > I started a thread at the Chromium OS google groups (called Chromium > OS: compile using musl as default ): > > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-os-dev/ii= DRh42EmvE > > I think that it would benefit the Chromium OS, but they need to be > convinced more and want more proof (see reply by Kevin). More realistic for them would be to switch to their better internal Android libc, written in C++. This is much more secure than glibc and musl and also fast enough. They also implemented zero-cost bounds checking C99 extensions. --000000000000e8aeb705a0d3c0f2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Brian Peregrine <peregrinebrian@gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 14. M=C3=A4rz 20= 20, 18:05:
I started a thread at th= e Chromium OS google groups (called Chromium
OS: compile using musl as default ):
https:/= /groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-os-dev/iiDRh42EmvE=

I think that it would benefit the Chromium OS, but they need to be
convinced more and want more proof (see reply by Kevin).


More realistic for them would be to switch to their better internal A= ndroid libc, written in C++. This is much more secure than glibc and musl a= nd also fast enough.
They also implemented zero-cost= bounds checking C99 extensions.
--000000000000e8aeb705a0d3c0f2--