From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10107 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alba Pompeo Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Julia on musl libc systems Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:00:44 -0300 Message-ID: References: <20160130144011.GS9621@port70.net> <20160131010750.GT9621@port70.net> <20160131164956.GY9621@port70.net> <20160131180034.GZ9621@port70.net> <20160131184546.GG9349@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160131204050.GA9621@port70.net> <20160131204222.GB9621@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465423270 9297 80.91.229.3 (8 Jun 2016 22:01:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:01:10 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10120-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jun 09 00:00:59 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bAlX0-0001NY-II for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:00:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1493 invoked by uid 550); 8 Jun 2016 22:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 1472 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2016 22:00:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UJ3vjzOIWonAJ+44VtXNL4dLExBy+AQ9xv3WUNwl4Vk=; b=AyCvTC1zGLkDYxzzpLJ7PhrPNVnQldmyUAzRS2/DwiYapBnLi3rsrT5ZwHYqDNOziz jV3kAhdXrYcpQ9NScsYoUQReN0puVf+2Y5FwnpIfxzXjZA3tlNKqosegcPbY58l/cSej wwlOvJt1PSwiA6xTL/60G80OoZhKp0R4WdpPt3b8wCVbtYog8DMVhwnbziME4uvTzuvs 3wtMCXCv9+PjPIVPslqu25Dc7yFjS7hzKy2egQdEnE1mze+hn69RzGgqs/x/xsWmL/ve S+voPKTRHQbLMHMtcKpCfxWxv90+lZ2GghVxMxXAnpQrDLovkTAtv6o+ZLjR1vyagH3s 8Cnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UJ3vjzOIWonAJ+44VtXNL4dLExBy+AQ9xv3WUNwl4Vk=; b=GqOuvsJQv/7NTsSKkWbfxhFvoop8wLzofaiW9k3iPFRifEqpNsz5mZPtsi84V21OEZ mmg/enoGdTlgvcyERH4GBVQLvn4smju8ZUh6KY+lLmy/EEGfKIHjWQrgm//n3Eqko7ap jydbslvKYKcgAT9BsDp9/fCR3uumUyKEXLEdAoLZeDzU7xU4Ua/KMeNfgTn3GssTOdQg zFvQL30mCM+zHlYkmMA1X59Y67BaJhT2Zf2aY5jW3dhpMLQgXsHlXgN6+w9cmZgAgwnj oOb91ob1eqiuFDt5Z04hMwgyMnjyO6d7mpzWzytwNjDmaUABQ42IrpQ3o3l767v758Xf kUPw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKyHiOH6wnlpGSJ+fXsATgSgFx8z+5R7dKXQrb2txsbSk1NAlC2V5dts/ngmGOM9MpGdMEmaQ3oXr4ZLw== X-Received: by 10.159.35.117 with SMTP id 108mr3467908uae.118.1465423244436; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 15:00:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10107 Archived-At: A friend found out that SuiteSparse compiles fine with GCC Optimization -O2. It only fails with default -O3. Maybe this helps debug? Ciao. On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Alba Pompeo wrote: > Has there been any development on this? > I tried again and it still fails. > $ wget http://faculty.cse.tamu.edu/davis/SuiteSparse/SuiteSparse-4.5.3.tar.gz > $ tar -xzvf SuiteSparse-4.5.3.tar.gz > $ cd SuiteSparse-4.5.3 > $ make > In file included from ../Modify/cholmod_updown.c:284:0: > ../Modify/t_cholmod_updown_numkr.c: In function 'updown_8_4': > ../Modify/t_cholmod_updown.c:47:27: internal compiler error: in > vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:2596 > #define FORM_NAME(k,rank) updown_ ## k ## _ ## rank > ^ > ../Modify/t_cholmod_updown.c:48:25: note: in expansion of macro 'FORM_NAME' > #define NUMERIC(k,rank) FORM_NAME(k,rank) > ^ > ../Modify/t_cholmod_updown_numkr.c:325:13: note: in expansion of macro 'NUMERIC' > static void NUMERIC (WDIM, RANK) > ^ > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > Makefile:478: recipe for target 'cholmod_updown.o' failed > make[3]: *** [cholmod_updown.o] Error 1 > > > Can you reproduce the issue? > > Ciao. > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> * Szabolcs Nagy [2016-01-31 21:40:50 +0100]: >>> * Rich Felker [2016-01-31 13:45:50 -0500]: >>> > Are they perhaps using C++ and precompiled headers? The latter are >>> >>> no, a reduced test case is attached >> >> now really >> >>> gcc -O3 bug.c >>> >>> fails, but >>> >>> gcc -O3 -fno-tree-slp-vectorize bug.c >>> >>> passes, so CFLAGS+=-fno-tree-slp-vectorize is a >>> workaround. >>> >>> probably related to >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68517 >>> (although i dont see 0 sized structs here), >>> but i could not reproduce it with another toolchain, >>> only with the alpine x86_64 gcc-5.3.0 one.