enh,
on Fri, 23 Sep 2022 08:28:52 -0700 you (enh <enh@google.com>) wrote:
> since you asked for comments, it would have been even better to have
> direct links to the relevant documents (such as
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n2829.htm for the
> assert() changes),
yes, the idea is to add such a link when I manage to discuss the
particular feature more in detail
that...
my hope is also still that we may have a diff-version of the C standard
at some point in the nearer future, but it seems that the editors have
problems with the tooling for that
...and that sound even better, yes --- but i always worry about "the perfect is the enemy of the good". a 20% solution today is worth more to me than a 100% solution a year from now :-)
anyone know whether <stdbit.h> is likely to be implemented by gcc/clang (since most/all of that stuff should end up as __builtin_foo() anyway)?
> but just having a list of things to search out is
> useful in its own right, so thanks for this!
Thanks
Jₑₙₛ
--
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est ::: Camus ::::::: ICube/ICPS :::
:: :::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 ::
:: ::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
:: http://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::