From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 22991 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 15:44:49 -0000 Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Nov 2022 15:44:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5467 invoked by uid 550); 10 Nov 2022 15:44:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 5423 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 15:44:45 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lVstPXJxp9KfFu/XUOWQTBjhMc+Xp4cWyP2q9A3657M=; b=SE3y/0Lz+jOfmtPftrUPjeX9gnTtcRxS5yqNmq49WXHxfRpQp7rb9f4fRoVUmcHUWO SzTV0NnmxhQuEMbeGIO7gj07XasxX46mqeSYg1XSltDkPKwVZ4JgloLb5n6TxxxoNOQE M1AGMMNJHdWuxa2yXX9b+bpu2y5E8SIGdAb3FUoNjJLTBWub9z6i1+O3nRebnA/l3bue vm9YETu3o6drF7MmN1bQ8jkkSKG4qyeTACoVVDfjqOcWIVx+3EeIg4K1+jvxt8rwMzU6 TAoRGJfi6TOQglxOYZTpU1O/ObCf6OG1+hFQ5sLAcwAbCyBMmwsGANllCmYKjngOdLqj 7ZNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lVstPXJxp9KfFu/XUOWQTBjhMc+Xp4cWyP2q9A3657M=; b=PFU0pl+Tp49xlHLu0jtXY/pIt+DBKggQQ4vFef7XkTjLb38RXm+muQCN83Sk7lq8jC nc88lmAfPk5buEmoNx4NfiWGawNqvfI4D0PmkzmDyTQKeCoIgjZoO2brC2eK/AZEyKYD vqvak+cYfbva1n5Z5GqFUoC+l704sVayMd5/7LuNHletCnklxKapDIj2kDLY0KKBqG51 Krw7NFyKHcldzZ/908cgdZO8AUmcnZNsA92jfN0WziomQkmH1nFGGnSRBwJt5AKiIlgy xS4XoT68bkuVqyJHuQsfoTcEa3XNX1SxINrkUk5Hr1jHJNktOYP1laxK+1mcq9Iu2jqc IcGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2HfiD29B9YGIKb99G7BkTYhIqa57DmextOdV8qydVJQK3TMmrX z1MyljlvtGEGJiK/g3GSmcSFDdrdMH2IFMAkNJHspN0v0bjdFA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM76j3rDjYTk0ekA0poCY3bCn6A6IQbVIJT+zXyh+quM+yy6yrB3dDVQf+gEmSb7KKvOJzEcb1JuJaxGJEtqpP4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1670:b0:6fa:7d46:33ad with SMTP id d16-20020a05620a167000b006fa7d4633admr1107288qko.278.1668095074046; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:44:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: enh Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:44:23 -0800 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057793b05ed1fa61d" Subject: [musl] SA_RESTORER for rv64? --00000000000057793b05ed1fa61d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER since the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something? --00000000000057793b05ed1fa61d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for = SA_RESTORER since the initial commit, but i think that's just copy &= ; paste from whichever architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the lin= ux kernel itself doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm miss= ing something?
--00000000000057793b05ed1fa61d--