From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3556 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Kanakarakis Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New articles on ewontfix Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:45:27 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20130704164845.GA14035@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4F9B79E1CAB949A2B6315F4A2AB900FE@lightcubesolutions.com> <20130704175806.GQ29800@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d870fdef04504e0c59766 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1373039181 2211 80.91.229.3 (5 Jul 2013 15:46:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:46:21 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-3560-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jul 05 17:46:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uv8DF-0006Zi-4z for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:46:21 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 30375 invoked by uid 550); 5 Jul 2013 15:46:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 30361 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2013 15:46:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=EwTZXpV41UzND5NGv9Zqhsth5OAJ1b6bbsoNf+HHlnU=; b=uSik8EPk7EBFo1SXKXMdpywPwuO5mtsthJ+YjCR71zAoRdzDy+kJF1idkm4ps5RCes COk1EpST7NxVAK2EkCEtPLerQfxRXF4SAnx+blTXLsKtYHGR4HZA5Km7bDLIOgQ8FdSu Keoj3vZ2ZcMebugwJP6ZzmGusl55P2yZVKAMhEZmmI/iQ9eJi5RuHcDrDosJJXq0GVyq ZTaF6ouGoSORDyYN+qiOLSrmFtYFP8FtgciVIV/0Si3F5cBa/vIKrWtxa0ET6ej012BO w6J+k4Z1uZNTDgtKo0g0CQl8BPg553IWsaXFbzUx8c+m/gZhPNUu0x9LJVbCiffEWyWl ch9w== X-Received: by 10.58.127.202 with SMTP id ni10mr7097722veb.27.1373039167990; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:46:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3556 Archived-At: --047d7b5d870fdef04504e0c59766 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I am waiting for the "library-safe" article ;) On 5 July 2013 18:31, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Jul 4, 2013, at 1:58 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > > >> I really enjoyed these, thanks! > > > > Thanks for the feedback. BTW, I think it's really nice how the > > widespread adoption of version control systems and web interfaces for > > them has made it possible to cite source so easily, in such a way that > > readers can go directly to the code I'm talking about and see for > > themselves what it's doing. > > Yep, it's at the point now where you can pretty much take it for granted. > Only after you commented did I recall what it was like a few years back > when typically the best you had was grabbing a cvs snapshot for yourself > and examining the code locally. > > Rich, you have the rare ability of being able communicate technical > details in a way that is easy to understand and not horribly dry to read. > If you ever have time and motivation, I would love to read an article from > you about what makes good software. For example, pitfalls to avoid in C > (esp. ones that even experienced devs fall into). Or good design decisions > on the Unix/Linux platform vs poor design decisions - writing good code > that is both efficient and scalable. > > I know you're busy and many of these things one can find piecemeal on the > internets. (E.g., Rob Landley has some good thoughts on his toybox list > about cleaning up code contributions to toybox.) Still, having one good > article that is a joy to read makes a huge difference. > > JH -- *Ivan c00kiemon5ter Kanakarakis* >:3 --047d7b5d870fdef04504e0c59766 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am waiting for the "library-safe" article ;= )=C2=A0




On 5 July 2013 18:31, Jeremy Huntwork &l= t;jhu= ntwork@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote:
Yep, it's at the point now where you can pretty much take it for = granted. Only after you commented did I recall what it was like a few years= back when typically the best you had was grabbing a cvs snapshot for yours= elf and examining the code locally.

Rich, you have the rare ability of being able communicate technical details= in a way that is easy to understand and not horribly dry to read. If you e= ver have time and motivation, I would love to read an article from you abou= t what makes good software. =C2=A0For example, pitfalls to avoid in C (esp.= ones that even experienced devs fall into). Or good design decisions on th= e Unix/Linux platform vs poor design decisions - writing good code that is = both efficient and scalable.

I know you're busy and many of these things one can find piecemeal on t= he internets. (E.g., Rob Landley has some good thoughts on his toybox list = about cleaning up code contributions to toybox.) Still, having one good art= icle that is a joy to read makes a huge difference.

JH



-- =
Ivan c00kiemon5ter Kanakarakis =C2=A0= >:3=C2=A0
--047d7b5d870fdef04504e0c59766--