On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>> With your program I see similar results:
>>
>> ....
>> size 50: min=10, avg=10           min=10, avg=10
>> size 52: min=10, avg=10           min=10, avg=10
>
> The ... was the part where mine seemed better. :)

Do you seriously think I would go as low as lying by omission?
Here are the full, unabridged files of three runs of both algorithms.

$ gcc -O2 -Wall memset-cycles-vda.c vda1.s.
$ ./a.out >vda1.OUT1 && ./a.out >vda1.OUT2 && ./a.out >vda1.OUT3
$ gcc -O2 -Wall memset-cycles-vda.c my2.s.
$ ./a.out >my2.OUT1 && ./a.out >my2.OUT2 && ./a.out >my2.OUT3