From: Justin Cormack <justin@specialbusservice.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: capset() capget() syscalls
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 22:07:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK4o1Wy1sk+sRnZ4OsKmDYSwgmBVmxEXMaHQjPtmC1wNu2buVg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120909210211.GH27715@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 08:40:25PM +0100, Justin Cormack wrote:
>> Here is an updated version of that list.
>>
>>
>> Syscalls not in Musl
>>
>> missing and should definitely be in:
>> ppoll
>> preadv
>> pwritev
>> setdomainname
>> mincore
>
> Added all of these; hopefully they work.
>
>> syncfs
>> clock_adjtime
>> remap_file_pages
>> kexec_load
>
> Pending but easy.
>
> BTW, some cleanup in the tree organization is still needed. I noticed
> src/linux has things like wait3/wait4 as well as the newly added dup3.
> Some of these are historical practice or improved analogues of
> standard functions, and probably belong alongside the standard
> functionality they go with. I'd eventually like src/linux to be JUST
> "linux features" like epoll, timerfd, etc. - all the stuff that's
> completely new features/functionality invented as part of Linux.
Makes sense.
>> some issues, may wait until decide how to resolve
>> recvmmsg
>> sendmmsg
>
> Indeed. We need to open a dialogue with the kernel folks about this...
>
>> useful but perhaps lower priority
>> futex
>> mqgetsetattr
>> lookup_dcookie
>> modify_ldt
>> name_to_handle_at
>> nfsservctl
>> open_by_handle_at
>> perf_event_open
>> getcpu
>> personality
>> quotactl
>> sched_setaffinity, sched_getaffinity (note glibc uses different
>> interface to syscalls)
>
> How did you assign priority? This set looks a lot more _useful_ than
> the first set, whereas the first set almost surely appears more widely
> in legacy software without an option to omit its use...
Probably no real rationale. The second set are probably more useful to
fewer programs. Merge the lists if you like.
>> may implement if someone has a real use
>> io_cancel, io_destroy, io_getevents, io_setup, io_submit (ie native
>> Linux aio not posix aio)
>>
>> obsolete or unimplemented in Linux
>> [...]
>> fanotify_init
>> fanotify_mark
>
> These are obsolete already? I thought fanotify was new...
Sorry, my mistake I was misremembering whatever there was before
inotify. These should be in (also need a bunch of structs etc for the
netlink part of the API I think).
>> [...]
>> get_robust_list
>
> This is not obsolete; it's just for implementation-internal use only.
Ah ok.
Justin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-09 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 11:51 igmar
2012-09-05 6:19 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-05 9:28 ` Igmar Palsenberg
2012-09-05 14:24 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-05 17:01 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-06 3:04 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-06 3:10 ` John Spencer
2012-09-06 3:20 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-06 3:28 ` Kurt H Maier
2012-09-06 3:41 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-06 4:41 ` Kurt H Maier
2012-09-06 8:22 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-06 9:28 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2012-09-06 14:23 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-07 4:56 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-08 16:02 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-08 22:14 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 20:04 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 20:14 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 21:13 ` James Cloos
2012-09-09 21:55 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 22:12 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 22:29 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 22:37 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-10 15:07 ` James Cloos
2012-09-08 21:25 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-08 22:15 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-08 23:56 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 0:21 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 8:21 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 19:40 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 21:02 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 21:07 ` Justin Cormack [this message]
2012-09-09 21:23 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 21:31 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-09 21:58 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-09 22:14 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-15 1:54 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-16 14:13 ` Justin Cormack
2012-09-17 2:27 ` Rich Felker
2012-09-06 11:47 ` Igmar Palsenberg
2012-09-06 11:36 ` Igmar Palsenberg
2012-09-06 14:11 ` Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK4o1Wy1sk+sRnZ4OsKmDYSwgmBVmxEXMaHQjPtmC1wNu2buVg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=justin@specialbusservice.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).