From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/347 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jens Staal Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl path Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 12:46:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <589f298577c7ae68a4e66f1b6f2ee488@smtp1.ispfr.net> <20110806162803.GX29562@port70.net> <20110806202736.GE132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312714049 20313 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2011 10:47:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:47:29 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-348-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Aug 07 12:47:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qq0t7-0005bE-ME for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:47:21 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 28605 invoked by uid 550); 7 Aug 2011 10:47:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 28597 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2011 10:47:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=FRKIgVutuKx3hnOXvUCAtJ4wBwYKYoQz+tmXaYV1rWA=; b=hqlTee/QASFeMLieYX21532YHXhOV3vEYkKHzf23SalFw0AsNHkgkRrN57348VoxrH 2A/sx1qA0T8xRIISfhMy9YA2xEXX7zPG6vBwPIy7kRyW0AfZ88YAVB9KDJCTIihN/lD2 a13FwSQZ8UBUVekL2HKAVavorbmuExcn9l+UY= In-Reply-To: <20110806202736.GE132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:347 Archived-At: I would definitely like the idea of the wrapper being a general tool for various libc's. Especially nice in order to play with the libc benchmarks (I tried making AURs for them but could not figure out how to get the different builds to use the different libcs installed on the system). If the wrappers also could include a number of different compilers, that would be great :) 2011/8/6 Rich Felker : > On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 10:14:33PM +0200, nicolas@atelier-web.com wrote: >> > prefix=we_dont_use_prefix_at_all >> > includedir=/usr/include >> > libdir=/lib >> > ALL_TOOLS= >> >> Thanks :) >> And is there a way to remove the gcc wrapper ? > > Setting ALL_TOOLS blank will prevent it from being installed. > > By the way, I'm thinking of moving the gcc wrapper to a separate > repository/tarball along with improving it, at some point in the near > future. I don't really like the clutter of having it > distributed/installed with musl, and as a separate standalone tool I > could make it work with uclibc and other libcs as well.. > > I'd welcome comments from users who like or dislike this idea. > > Rich >