From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1268
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: ELLCC and musl
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:13:47 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8RtFoqZi77NYW_7ipBJr9fu53J-c8H0jwgG1VAYQfeAPPcrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <191694293.HMKLPPv5sV@main.pennware.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341900864 5457 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2012 06:14:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 06:14:24 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1269-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jul 10 08:14:22 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1269-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1269-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1SoTiG-0008OT-Un
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:14:21 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1330 invoked by uid 550); 10 Jul 2012 06:14:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32766 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2012 06:14:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=a23eg5s+FPMNctSX7IArtiNGh5ABwq/aaRqDG7eZ0zI=;
        b=jrScPFlSz5RyjfPydceWHMaWybdEV9bYSJ95Z7ilV9qBJZs7AFqb7OZrmd4tXcZFH/
         UbsRmCtAkerb1shPEZ6J2wOT82q75cPSTahq8UTPYbsS+WwwDu/K1IPyrtYCQxA9HUSR
         sFrusnlrtgPDJKhIGd4uWau26le6CVHOxr9x2XdpHxdY7widTBXnMDIu/9YvNHohYDl+
         UmWJ+FyLw12V/yMy+Wi9SoCtkJr6kujajxTc9eLrjwnwCaiTaKkSuGNj2QME5Gwz2sUg
         Tcnlk6og+wpz8HUsqE3pHaY/9aScLpXKKAYtEnCTIcNRaQteMYdcefTNzgN13jhI2Ul7
         5uKA==
In-Reply-To: <191694293.HMKLPPv5sV@main.pennware.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1268
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1268>

2012/7/9 Richard Pennington <rich@pennware.com>:
> I added a blog post making my switch to musl official. :-)
> http://ellcc.org/blog/?p=135
>
> -Rich

Very cool!
Are the LLVM/Clang related patches from the LLVMlinux project
(http://llvm.linuxfoundation.org )* non-invasive enough to integrate
in ELLCC?
The LLVMlinux project currently targets x86_64, MIPS and ARM so it
seems to be quite similar to the interests of ELLCC.
This could be quite an interesting start of a new self-hosting
linux-based operating system based on musl+LLVM/{clang, libc++} :)

* for an easy overview how one can integrate the patches in a standard
svn build rather than the Makefiles/scripts from the LLVMlinux
project, see PKGBUILD at:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=60611

I have still not succeeded in building the x86_64 LLVMlinux kernel,
but it worked before with the LLL project so I will fight some more
with it later when time allows.