From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/981
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Hello
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 19:33:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8RtFqMr+gmh7yJ7aGPUCQ=ja55V9VG4ZCGUuS==NRfxHXEew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120607200123.402a1672@sibserver.ru>
	<4FD0A902.6070108@barfooze.de>
	<20120607231831.66c78c33@sibserver.ru>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ebb6e7e2ba04c1e547bd
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339090419 30755 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2012 17:33:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-982-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jun 07 19:33:38 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-982-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-982-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ScgaX-0007R4-64
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 19:33:37 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 28219 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jun 2012 17:33:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 28211 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2012 17:33:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=s4dmcQ9VE645qbMtmnlokFjzV9xA/Z7ey6aL88yweWg=;
        b=rb6C8hz0I6sddQQm7amiXEvcrQ9pLi/RIm3MIAqJtuVIucELRr8LPksCvcmQ0InxPB
         TfYPBVqC+BW4ROOW2JXmn0PybTA+6QqeW3hNNI+t5f23tckyPhxvFM2KbSO9WZrXM59w
         prO2AA9geVX9PjPNaqz7QR+dO1d0NU9TnGBLBnncOSYspfy9J6hKkWS3h+laeFnnzmII
         rvJDBsaXt9kn0kf3PpGbO0XKmWZBrw2sorz3qZpl+1B4LNWsDz+sPWvqyOkxfv5iFwxR
         3JavATMbdyOXLbq+LNYv3YyZ9xQxNR6g/ouaDpk7UmwfHn/nYoEqU/74MVZoZXwZdZsz
         Ehsg==
In-Reply-To: <20120607231831.66c78c33@sibserver.ru>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:981
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/981>

--e89a8fb1ebb6e7e2ba04c1e547bd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> And I already see the X11 stuff in the sabotage tree. Does it builds
> correctly?
> At this time I think to take an older X release without some stuff I
> don't need. X11R7.6 build requires python and weird xml libs for
> example. Maybe even XFree86 (to test it in qemu for the micro desktop
> system project).

What about the "tinyX" from tiny core linux? No idea if this could be built
statically even...

--e89a8fb1ebb6e7e2ba04c1e547bd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p><br>
&gt; And I already see the X11 stuff in the sabotage tree. Does it builds<br>
&gt; correctly?<br>
&gt; At this time I think to take an older X release without some stuff I<br>
&gt; don&#39;t need. X11R7.6 build requires python and weird xml libs for<br>
&gt; example. Maybe even XFree86 (to test it in qemu for the micro desktop<br>
&gt; system project).</p>
<p>What about the &quot;tinyX&quot; from tiny core linux? No idea if this could be built statically even...</p>

--e89a8fb1ebb6e7e2ba04c1e547bd--