From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/986
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Hello
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 20:03:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK8RtFqi3dC5fc-zN5baUhteaFRM7UbDH0atu7Mbi+vVFonNdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120607200123.402a1672@sibserver.ru> <4FD0A902.6070108@barfooze.de>
 <20120607231831.66c78c33@sibserver.ru> <4FD0D6D9.5080707@barfooze.de>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339092273 13814 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2012 18:04:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:04:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-987-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jun 07 20:04:32 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-987-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-987-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Sch4Q-0004oB-Dp
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:04:30 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 11304 invoked by uid 550); 7 Jun 2012 18:04:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11296 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2012 18:04:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Hg8yJyzTvCRr5Pah66O8Y3l/GkG+3hSxOQ1T63s2470=;
        b=Q1q4QKZpoka8Mc4qEMnGPdLDOyvTmT8j/tBHMHLLGe90eLSM6UV7LBRf6mYusuehAZ
         oA5mA1wTkUMRBcX9xFC9DPFtmDK6ky/fdaXW1fIrnXLVRdwGoFqsS1MwRPg9x4rsK662
         0Mg6nV2LTTUqXG/mvsHomrSbqZ1fI/O7amY3QP9y3ECVH1m46amMW3ORrrbOG0Nm7Inz
         uN07GlptnB44WbOHRlQcCTGjwwGlWSw5ThPHb6NvZJ5lCWGO8fiiBFtkBIypWxdU1I5q
         Zvo4oDz7Db7g1IyQ1pC1D6xI4K/3vv8oo0uwINq9kETUArhy4UWS3xJKd5zIIUr+6hxo
         MROQ==
In-Reply-To: <4FD0D6D9.5080707@barfooze.de>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:986
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/986>

2012/6/7 John Spencer <maillist-musl@barfooze.de>:
> On 06/07/2012 05:18 PM, orc wrote:
>>
> what kept me from configuring X11 to work properly is its huge freaking
> complexity.
> if an older version is simpler and can do the job as well, i'm all for it.
> i fear though that you won't get any up-to-date software compiled against
> it.
> probably not worth the effort.
>
> --JS

What about Tiny Core Linux's "tinyX", and perhaps one could even
compile that statically? I have no idea how compatible that is to
Xorg's X11 though... Another appealing alternative could be if there
is a small X11 layer to run on top of Wayland, if that would be easier
to build/configure.