From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/9696 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: George Kulakowski Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl licensing Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:47:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <56E98AB1.9030309@openwall.com> <20160316234656.GQ9349@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160317081748.GF13856@example.net> <20160317160131.GE21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160318042158.GN21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160318191209.GQ21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a1145a09c8863c2052e5804dd X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458330468 15148 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2016 19:47:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 19:47:48 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com, Christopher Lane Original-X-From: musl-return-9709-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Mar 18 20:47:48 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ah0N8-0007zt-Jh for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:47:46 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 7227 invoked by uid 550); 18 Mar 2016 19:47:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 7209 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2016 19:47:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hFK08Ee80vGAKew8+v2IX+2n43W/fM0yeD9yDPlo+DU=; b=LdKVgCiFpX4NzqGU1+rWNN4fQHqBZ8gn8y7c3xmFpCbdKGD41UvIKPSONy1fArNUk7 hNkVO1nKeT6ybtbh5Wg/MiwrkDz0kIEkuFjzD6TyAXkxc6FxRYjpB5wZWjxZ7QUZCTJ/ W1h+Nu/a15Yz4AxRvwTx86SwnglA/t/nN79LMjv/eHXZfjOL0jWLxY5EwuV47jhil2xA /brlXkCYn+qkpJg/T/NcP60ReH2u9Y5dMAnGj7n5t+7cspLNQzXE/GbI+3Iu7SU4ZUpK 6PRxhETb8CuqDjNMUIC9YGCSPriMPYZrwojLNyAraVPmRU0IhM69sGbyzGgeuXjPpQH7 VP1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hFK08Ee80vGAKew8+v2IX+2n43W/fM0yeD9yDPlo+DU=; b=V8CwSYa9nMZGbqRS5SQ+WNQZqC+v0QJyCJYm4wifBvo+zeCKbQZjiqXADftH7q+fB4 jt2Fz+nA1R9iLQa2vj8yYNC8UQGX6ftH0gVQuSklAu55HmSRu8v8mgS4h9gS+377icOL 1jH0vbHagaqdckXJxnNTTin2PCl94wA/06WAoJejRMJIQZbT8VyHRUPsj2u6KSky6T0B gsxuUSy9DYgP3ZBdijKB9XIxOsHcydztOc5Rg7XLLoBFrf4omx8SmBEmM0Y8Uu0axUiR 9owqUOhDudEQsusnVpMY3COmQURA4ED9bf+5I6G8RIG/uadJkQSs9bfGhlqZxQwz+yOW SadQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJXgQzmM5HBXA1JNmiVf6jOtOMFwDx61P/sTOXzRvJSwcYs8IJYnhixFxtIAHDIlyzUAnnPD/WvyTcnVgpb X-Received: by 10.98.19.195 with SMTP id 64mr25115283pft.62.1458330451529; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160318191209.GQ21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:9696 Archived-At: --001a1145a09c8863c2052e5804dd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1145a09c8863bc052e5804db --001a1145a09c8863bc052e5804db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I wanted to mention another small thing, which is simply to update the names of some files specifically mentioned in COPYRIGHT. I've attached a diff. On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 PM Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:16:49AM -0700, Christopher Lane wrote: > > > Some version of the PD text can remain in place but I can clarify that > > > it's my/our belief about these files and does not negate the fact that > > > we're licensing the whole project, including these files as part of > > > it, under the MIT license. Assuming we get a suitable response for #3 > > > above, I can also add the text that the following contributors > > > (listed) all grant the attribution exception for these files. And for > > > future port contributors I can ask them to do the same at the time of > > > contribution. > > > > > > Is this acceptable? If it sounds like it may be but there are > > > questions about the specific language I can prepare a proposed diff > > > for the COPYRIGHT file for review. > > > > > > > So yeah, this is a good idea. Please send the diff and I'll get their > > comments on the specific language. > > Please let me know what you (or your lawyers) think of the attached > diff. As an extra bonus I made an effort to avoid the actual words > "Public Domain" since they apparently scare people off. Does this > work? Does anyone from the community (esp. any of the contributors I'd > be asking to agree) have objections to it? > > Rich > --001a1145a09c8863bc052e5804db Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wanted to mention another small thing, which is simply t= o update the names of some files specifically mentioned in COPYRIGHT. I'= ;ve attached a diff.

On = Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:12 PM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote: