From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8608
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: linux/vt.h
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 06:01:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKpSnp+jJvxm0yHCQKndk8nDDSg=xdRyxhT_y01JpZtH2JrTOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151003122734.GA3258@localhost>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443877327 22332 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2015 13:02:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 13:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-8620-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Oct 03 15:01:46 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-8620-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-8620-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ZiMRd-0001gt-1J
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:01:45 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 23696 invoked by uid 550); 3 Oct 2015 13:01:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 23655 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2015 13:01:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=2jIMDS9oeXjLTLcMYcbSndbm7B392jj6Zswkm3h5s2U=;
        b=Hmgd1ZKHR2gkh5BHbjJw32LGKgPpLmuoyyzUvfHp4UaHIkJIlgkcg49IxOm5yeN3eQ
         228cE/xpK61Eosyes7sh15oV/7JhRPKMR61Velki850fx4DzxfdpUBkHel8Y/wodIcev
         nEooCgZ1jFZUg/RYo2BM02ai95Kx4K50T/1qg/IH15c9x1uwvtk9TS+hVmIGbbXYF6QX
         F+Rmsc3TkhE3Xzzawcd3uUlrJv+gsOAdpZEzpMoyTE5NHmLVeQO8FmF02jL/FYtJuZCf
         OrrDldpUwbFfPNetJfo+2w6P6F7FFnTVWJAGu6hGci8U0+5o370f6652XO2pNhcjH9px
         F9Xg==
X-Received: by 10.112.163.193 with SMTP id yk1mr7504231lbb.1.1443877290599;
 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 06:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151003122734.GA3258@localhost>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8608
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8608>

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:27 AM, vlse <vlse@veera.biz> wrote:
>>In order to use these, you need to have kernel headers installed.
>>There are several ways to get them, but the easiest is the way
>>provided by the kernel:
>
>>https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kbuild/headers_install.txt
>
> But the vanilla kernel headers/source are not properly adapted for musl; is'nt it. Or has it changed with musl and we can use the vanilla kernel sources from www.kernel.org.
>
> But then why do sabotage uses modified/adapted kernel headers.

Good question. Conventional wisdom states that one must keep the
headers glibc was compiled against, not the headers of the current
kernel, but the why is never explained. Does it apply here (with
s/glibc/musl)?

Jorge