From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8612
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Re: linux/vt.h
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:37:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKpSnpLaavREwThY5e_wS+N62qQ9ueE1Km91k5OpPLqWJ8h-_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151003122734.GA3258@localhost>
	<CAKpSnp+jJvxm0yHCQKndk8nDDSg=xdRyxhT_y01JpZtH2JrTOQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151003180015.GA8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443897458 26898 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2015 18:37:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-8624-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Oct 03 20:37:38 2015
Return-path: <musl-return-8624-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-8624-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ZiRgf-0002bq-MS
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 20:37:37 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 24449 invoked by uid 550); 3 Oct 2015 18:37:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 24427 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2015 18:37:35 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=mSnoZGPK1g7nQ9UKXv69P7dMx7hZX0/LpORhm3S36Wc=;
        b=Y6i9t4atlBzPkDpu2sYpmH/TuGzOj0yvH4VpTI8OXMSc97/a3NC6VVvI5tdnLicd3P
         po+65FFAg7q4asUVEOZ/SbpRfoos/blIUNOdlAg9a0vhUhYXPRGinFtxtURmJm3SS+j0
         s7+pOCK5hwEAF/nkhu9v/Mp7dqhfriEwjyC16u41MLY/MYldnIUL2rcHY4Pf2l11Cy6a
         EY0IBoG1JRFM+1Sa7/zoFl5AkmgbOuNfF8K60FC9CaVIPdSgVPciyyUeDbOWqwZAZlG/
         x9k24sjUnTqSkMquOF3qmTlcbAiEXK3723hqCTBKehdCNS6HsqGHVwCl6Y5VLnx7oKLV
         RHxA==
X-Received: by 10.25.143.72 with SMTP id r69mr5387212lfd.65.1443897444257;
 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151003180015.GA8645@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:8612
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/8612>

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 06:01:30AM -0700, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 5:27 AM, vlse <vlse@veera.biz> wrote:

>> > But then why do sabotage uses modified/adapted kernel headers.
>>
>> Good question. Conventional wisdom states that one must keep the
>> headers glibc was compiled against, not the headers of the current
>> kernel, but the why is never explained. Does it apply here (with
>> s/glibc/musl)?
>
> This does not apply whatsoever to musl since musl does not use kernel
> headers at all -- unless you want to count the few wrappers in sys/*.h
> which this thread is about, but musl is not actually "using" the
> kernel headers here, just helping applications that use the official
> <sys/*.h> includes find the kernel headers for their own use.
>
Thanks, clear enough.

Jorge