From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4891
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: M Farkas-Dyck <strake888@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: [patch] expose execvpe under _(GNU|BSD)_SOURCE
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:17:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eAJ0p9MW-0j3arX_Ty_XazWX4X4H6EqfbmDe1ajgQmpBg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL3m8eBr=qr7NzYiJMfOffSJ0AQd8CZPDQ1ntd6y6JKxRDJc1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140416030624.GD26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397621890 1352 80.91.229.3 (16 Apr 2014 04:18:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 04:18:10 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-4895-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 16 06:18:04 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-4895-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-4895-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1WaHIR-0000Rq-GM
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 06:18:03 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 3657 invoked by uid 550); 16 Apr 2014 04:18:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 3649 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2014 04:18:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=bH8xQqLAmugsI5AIYQiNjnsbPGoLCxvZe7sf+rg85Uw=;
        b=ojKlciDUNqiOcb7IZxW4tA/6xKSDuvnOQmi0WZSZNXMg/ICvRZWDyXoDnfA4Wfd5lq
         3VJuuTqcYrWNfUpb/nl6o69eR5uHvOsniMV7AW1Pnec+nnSI/Qzgov0HhyhWvZrCZIPy
         ok932Y6DIUCWk5CGI2vWibrG2Gp3aazrYhrT0cbukoP4j5r98DO75ti9NkTFsfmnRlr2
         ACVsk30YEm0adbui2Is+1971cLdao8XTwOkMPOL1DNtnLekSS1ytcJGMN5S2En+mNQFm
         y2ObxjJ1Eemuu2joq56cvdV7lrlog6SRR5h292I+BzP1wkmB6u6lSO8z7jDAGNuOb98E
         PBPA==
X-Received: by 10.181.13.112 with SMTP id ex16mr17305660wid.23.1397621871386;
 Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:17:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140416030624.GD26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4891
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4891>

On 15/04/2014, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> Testing feature test macros with #ifdef in the libc source files is not meaningful

also, derp.