From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2566
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Strake <strake888@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: NULL
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 10:23:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eAmFQxkq=KeJd2dacPWH8OX3Le5F6SXR_R4tnkaNkZjEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130112133114.GH20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<1358087360.32505.12@driftwood>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358090653 2161 80.91.229.3 (13 Jan 2013 15:24:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 15:24:13 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-2567-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Jan 13 16:24:29 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-2567-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-2567-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1TuPQ8-0000MF-R3
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:24:25 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 11467 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jan 2013 15:24:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 11459 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2013 15:24:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=XZBxiMep6ORVstLJ38QUJ3T+bkhPH3it1ZANx9Oszzs=;
        b=sokSP0RxD0cZtzBGVwV0oT8O6qGcjUL93SDr0v3A4yBX/zZnm+20XLFhrSwTI1UE5/
         znv7vLd0YylcCDG41ZVVwoe/alRf3RcZJQ9ulO/tKwf4RRCV7zu1442c8Ie6VfLVrMdD
         JaVDNkor49JuX3GmVFMBDHbza/exHNnQscPmVQpL8k76lDdtPsNvOkJwrkP8Q2U0HeMh
         mROSAZJV9bdAiMX6gMt+PqYoHJNgJ20yLv4R8Pp8+kk7EvzxH8kKSv5L+kFNzcD3nCAa
         wk97FMDbQCJaitZbi9dKC0L3zinPNGeg22+4rS9rTEdjJK7ZeA2VxtSuroxe08ajq5rA
         lqUQ==
In-Reply-To: <1358087360.32505.12@driftwood>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2566
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2566>

On 13/01/2013, Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
> I read "incorrect programs" and "c++ programs" as synonymous, but I'm
> biased.

A strong bias indeed, to assume that anything written in another
language is fault-free.

Cheers,
Strake