From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4912 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: M Farkas-Dyck Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New domain! Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 21:16:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20140416155210.GA11894@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <534EE3B8.2090304@skarnet.org> <20140417041800.GL26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <534F92A6.80806@skarnet.org> <20140418210038.GN26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397873818 32024 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2014 02:16:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 02:16:58 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4916-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Apr 19 04:16:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WbKpl-0007wh-Bc for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 04:16:49 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21514 invoked by uid 550); 19 Apr 2014 02:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21506 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2014 02:16:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pitIWHs0v6afXOpi2RHuWacL9z/89gS1ozETa+LTGOY=; b=Tht3bXF+DrzsPQCwxC0y1as8cEbolofcKLyZ5QyveMAjoMcvMvG+MMtNPU6tXZKRYD t2AlcL63tGNA8N85WdwK+2zHZaNwfS6HAXeRpBD4bu/ZkJ2FKuDWrgYLx0i/Uk+DWWBn wBQ2wMgtVnav8elBhhp1EHvrogULHud9YtfGQK+xsjpN6wQCoClC99QM9qR68JWpj71m u8TgNZY6UI+w/UZsl+r1csJ+8H6q/wCZWUVDDcbOlnzTphJWePrbmG63E4rn4nHG29j2 luWlAVCzkcVffSRkZfUmJJGIWOUidkp6Fdq/cOp4ffqmhPhlW0qC55zTSp4Ed8hpBjGr eb4w== X-Received: by 10.194.243.3 with SMTP id wu3mr18728321wjc.29.1397873796771; Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:16:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140418210038.GN26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4912 Archived-At: On 18/04/2014, Rich Felker wrote: > I think it's more just a matter of the practical pros and cons, and > one issue is establishing name recognition. musl.libc.org establishes > name recognition for musl and plain libc.org or www.libc.org doesn't. Like kernel.org. I think they at least ought to have registered linux.org too, but meh. > So I'm leaning towards an approach that uses them in conjunction with > musl.libc.org being the musl site and libc.org being something that's > not misrepresented as fully independent of musl, but that's also more > general. This makes sense. > Securing a mail system that > can end up sending outgoing mail is a big deal and really sucks if you > get it wrong (spam liability). I doubt whether it's worth the bother. That said, if you think so, I'd like =E2=98=BA