From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
"musl@lists.openwall.com" <musl@lists.openwall.com>,
gcc@gcc.gnu.org, Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: RFC: adding Linux vsyscall-disable and similar backwards-incompatibility flags to ELF headers?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 17:51:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUzU5UVe_2eWuMCOgHTs=5mnor5m0RO0STTi3K5FzdNvQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all-
Linux has a handful of weird features that are only supported for
backwards compatibility. The big one is the x86_64 vsyscall page, but
uselib probably belongs on the list, too, and we might end up with
more at some point.
I'd like to add a way that new programs can turn these features off.
In particular, I want the vsyscall page to be completely gone from the
perspective of any new enough program. This is straightforward if we
add a system call to ask for the vsyscall page to be disabled, but I'm
wondering if we can come up with a non-syscall way to do it.
I think that the ideal behavior would be that anything linked against
a sufficiently new libc would be detected, but I don't see a good way
to do that using existing toolchain features.
Ideas? We could add a new phdr for this, but then we'd need to play
linker script games, and I'm not sure that could be done in a clean,
extensible way.
--Andy
next reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-02 0:51 Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2015-09-02 1:12 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2015-09-02 2:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 1:53 ` Brian Gerst
2015-09-02 2:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 13:57 ` Brian Gerst
2015-09-02 14:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 2:54 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2015-09-02 3:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 4:18 ` Rich Felker
2015-09-02 4:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 4:55 ` Rich Felker
2015-09-02 5:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-09-02 5:22 ` Rich Felker
2015-09-02 12:48 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALCETrUzU5UVe_2eWuMCOgHTs=5mnor5m0RO0STTi3K5FzdNvQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).