From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5098
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Pawe=C5=82_Dziepak?= <pdziepak@quarnos.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add definition of max_align_t to stddef.h
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 21:11:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CALS3df2uYSN+G1FDVm5dPtGq2GwTtAQ_WCVyeM5fYk7xR6HmdA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALS3df03N2BqPCAf2jx50zUJheGyMOZJkdpGzLUEhqjwV5Zoew@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140507031306.GA26963@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<CALS3df1_+E30JX-e_ig1qv13o_uzvN=9qJfVq1Qi7JjYopGQ9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140507230729.GD26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<CALS3df0UZL+njwr+9estXnP+pWn=7o9OEu+5gQt8J+N3BjRf7A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140508174138.GJ26358@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<1399574705.12065.58.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399576303 15801 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2014 19:11:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 19:11:43 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-5103-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu May 08 21:11:38 2014
Return-path: <musl-return-5103-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-5103-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1WiTjG-0006KQ-EM
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 08 May 2014 21:11:38 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15616 invoked by uid 550); 8 May 2014 19:11:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15605 invoked from network); 8 May 2014 19:11:37 -0000
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=U/AOAMY2qx2tkEtJTGA7A5lwiqNc4coqQ1V5n+Q6/10=;
        b=cSRsos5dYRfhrFfBahxrkEyu9eOGLIqfhroIIukbG3RqQT9kI9bxYsokoXLHL6Xk0q
         jd0pSHfJ1AqaTVAPVXJWmDx3yunR8aE0EOxIDzsyG7JPvnOR9C40TZcR1Muby5SOj5Ru
         Af+zqio7ZmqrHKZa8tEPc8Z7AO5l5Z66fTLIGai5IAiEUE3NqPOZb2axxyOWLWkBxQr8
         jHAdH2392OYhgqo5w0lM6M2+7L+GmXaEgfkCrC0gCvvtkk2JayYVwzZDWDI+pFbIRAPh
         SgLYtzmKXeH6CKfyjjYAmRu+N3xCWNJ0QgdJAY34y8WpWSapPyPVahan/9rck+9VbcW/
         tCsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl1aiCCHWOUz/flB8uzGb1/CIwJ202kRcJrNaWg6tR3+heFq5Jq0M6kexjvJRfebEdS0rNN
X-Received: by 10.50.143.34 with SMTP id sb2mr58682514igb.48.1399576285141;
 Thu, 08 May 2014 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1399574705.12065.58.camel@eris.loria.fr>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:5098
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/5098>

2014-05-08 20:45 GMT+02:00 Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2014, 13:41 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
>> BTW in your above example, it's not even clear to me if that use of
>> alignas is valid.
>
> Besides the question of such a thing makes sense or no=C5=A3 with the
> current version of the standard it isn't syntactically valid. alignas
> can't be applied to struct fields. So for the moment the whole
> discussion in the standard about types with extended alignment is
> pointless.
>
> This issue has been raised as a defect report, and it seems that the
> committee agrees to change this in a corrigendum.
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_444.htm

My bad, it is legal in C++11 though.

Pawe=C5=82