Have you considered github

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 3:38 PM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
Here are some things I've really been wanting to get done for a while,

that I/we should try to make happen in the coming months:



Switching over wiki. The current wiki is essentially unmaintained.

Kylie McClain (Somasis) has setup a clone of the content on a new

git-based wiki that looks good. I still want to understand the

intended workflow for getting changes published, but it's got to be

better than the status quo where account creation doesn't even work.



Adopting an issue tracker. This requires actually selecting one and

setting up the infrastructure for it. The wiki could possibly be moved

to the same infrastructure. (I want to keep webapp-ish stuff like

wiki, issue tracker etc. off the server that hosts git and release

downloads because anything interactive is a significant attack

surface that puts integrity of code as risk.)



Enabling git-over-https. This may require switching to a more-capable

httpd or other infrastructure changes on the server.



Website redesign and move to musl.libc.org. I don't have any concrete

ideas for this yet, but I don't think the current website is at all in

line with musl's maturity, current adoption/deployment, etc.



Documentation. Existing manual should probably become a public git

repo that contributors can submit patches/PRs for. Putting together

lists of (1) what's outdated in the current one, and (2) what new

content would be most valuable, might be a good place to start and one

that could benefit from community involvement.