From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4192 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 17:35:22 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Nov 2022 17:35:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 18339 invoked by uid 550); 10 Nov 2022 17:31:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 18254 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2022 17:31:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=Cj4NTSKI1EOBNpKUe8uVKbjXZqDqIsPSXmtknKZG930=;
        b=mbal+jdCxsCJlqiS7gKVNJJ6MBJd3MREUFQXvn4Jm0YffQr1ZS+lX51LFXEFOEgfPt
         voVrH64IeOWPWsZ1A5IqfHZPhir11oT6DPh1VuE6+9OmGhXckRWd8GMtSOmLFnmF4Hek
         xx9+yasq3r+EKtbTcjCtuBce/V3Axp+qPWBb/M4CKx/AZPfCNc9l2vsFfKp25LftnsfG
         vs/53xhq2mDtUyyLBxw+Pz97VLzLSBmuIO3Tct+HK5IBHKfUjxslyuIxnpHhrUGmtZUq
         yQD3qeCJYM12sYVW1PkJM0qAFENczsOd1W+RXfmeJKLrpEzRJabrTYrjgt7vAQkrmH9M
         vdtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=Cj4NTSKI1EOBNpKUe8uVKbjXZqDqIsPSXmtknKZG930=;
        b=XEJ9adMtD7fux0O5WDnWd+aFKeKYXfmxN+yX6trfK5QM1DAlyvS1bBklFbR/4oB14J
         sJGJVnuoHMXDX5nGl3F5JrjmwaONN/6wfDeCBM+/mfGRB57oyJJDLYnwugydQ63ajisl
         aoMwiVB+Ybgx4CwrW+oGdnvgCq+YSQ2cxsTlPz6qmbtsujgE7F0+b8Kgdnczzih4tK0k
         D9v2MjUL9M/aOJ1kpr3LTl/ZdlOSyHDARmlcAz0vKzH0lEw1hrBG58KBv873UcW+KuWN
         E/c/AmrlzwaRb7REFtochh2sTPPU50Cl52z/oP4oA1ReUpiZGEor4+kVvtG1jhmXyD90
         sf7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2ZRNE8t7AyDRjhCNX/g/TnQvGVIT4B2j2wxo7Tk+pX3XC4vxdQ
	m1wQK0smL9YkkulrK/yAEdjQ/e27E0E/nC8ulAL90n+W
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7Dr25XGcZc7JkwVuO5jHZA5EKGq1Qpd+XEaSngMFfdq7mTFloPwGoo/NDjRO7HveDjNf437zbc4g3QH6nEeDo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:b11:b0:13a:f2d0:e7b4 with SMTP id
 lh17-20020a0568700b1100b0013af2d0e7b4mr1718257oab.262.1668101495101; Thu, 10
 Nov 2022 09:31:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJgzZop1a9bGP6fZgZo4XS9Cb4HnmY=an==G=_u5y+ZxQ0SRcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20221110171858.GJ29905@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
In-Reply-To: <20221110171858.GJ29905@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
From: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 09:31:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMKF1sqtwcoay6_bLEKzKfW3-mVAzQF8Q9QqSHxssr-JX9wjXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Cc: enh <enh@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [musl] SA_RESTORER for rv64?

On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 9:19 AM Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 07:44:23AM -0800, enh wrote:
> > arch/riscv64/bits/signal.h has contained a definition for SA_RESTORER since
> > the initial commit, but i think that's just copy & paste from whichever
> > architecture the rv64 headers were based on? the linux kernel itself
> > doesn't have SA_RESTORER for rv64, unless i'm missing something?
>
> I suspect this is just a mistake. Have you seen any ill effects from
> it? If riscv folks can confirm it's wrong, I'll remove it.

Yeah I think it should be removed. Perhaps mips is in same boat.

>
> Rich