Analyse the source, if you can't do that analyse the binary. This is a big project though, assuming apis are the same (no runtime tests) a sufficiently useful package manager would be able to find packages that could say work with a partial compat api and those that could not. The alternative is to have the gentoo style 1000 monkeys. On Apr 2, 2015 1:41 PM, "Jean-Marc Pigeon" wrote: > On 04/02/2015 02:48 PM, u-wsnj@aetey.se wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:17:36PM -0400, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > >>>> bash-4.3# ldd SysV.so > >>>> ldd (0x7f5d60dd2000) > >>>> libc.so => ldd (0x7f5d60dd2000) > >>>> Error relocating SysV.so: Perl_croak: symbol not found > >>>> Error relocating SysV.so: Perl_sv_setiv: symbol not found > >>>> Error relocating SysV.so: Perl_sv_2pv_flags: symbol not found > >>>> Error relocating SysV.so: Perl_av_store: symbol not found > >>>> etc. > > > >> I am using a packager using ldd to establish > >> dependencies list. > > > > I would not say reporting the symbols is a bug, rather that the packager > > is kind of relying on UB. Is there a specification of how a program > called > > "ldd" shall format its output and which data shall be present? > > > > Rune > > > Packager Relying on ldd UB, sure!. > Using ldd was the best way I found to list one package all > dependencies (looking at ELF file type ans searching for > required external components). > If you have a better way (more standard) to propose not using > ldd that will be a good thing. idea? > > > -- > > A bientôt > =========================================================== > Jean-Marc Pigeon E-Mail: jmp@safe.ca > SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280 > Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last) > Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca"> > =========================================================== > >