From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Received: (qmail 4411 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2022 11:12:04 -0000
Received: from second.openwall.net (193.110.157.125)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 1 Aug 2022 11:12:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 29964 invoked by uid 550); 1 Aug 2022 11:12:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Received: (qmail 29931 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2022 11:12:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc;
        bh=1rvZmpDWZ0Jt2yw0pTfOZcnOvf0EUtFrpeDJJns1lqE=;
        b=SDnVWrFnt5iOMFp+R0QzIXrAnSixnU0NU2lu15lcANRQzcRVUOXBVyPbpwK1NsipQd
         n5G0VYS7ZGmKdpfKTH/xSqPwf/qcYXfrELkV5RkW+FRwB1Fu3gGbXgC2xd1U4H9TUrh8
         kfhZYx+hQZDBPPO3n6WjYeaLGgQURRFF6RfIl+TPI5h5Hh7j1PESNbKiY5U7mezePEMi
         AYvQP+ifrsn/2SFbtQOZG2duxZDjn1rCTF3mt59954OV5Asa6i/DOtw1MTDTopZzng/v
         3K58oQWh24B34+K0ZSXvmcUaBkRr65rs2B6GxL+KLKSwLnBD3+tdfgEiYpDn+z4BVPjJ
         VNrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc;
        bh=1rvZmpDWZ0Jt2yw0pTfOZcnOvf0EUtFrpeDJJns1lqE=;
        b=JFaCTS3mt/TPxB4d1pNzHVVJQ/BdGkq6neDQKNV4XgNZD4rjmQIWSZQ4fNdjOFUma/
         2p5jEbBLuClelnUuT5faQN3VptZ/HKtdnrOJWyssxHt2w5N8d+sFSSdsOYIQf5opV9qK
         YSzoelKebHf+RKRKcUABokA9v9oUXc92BJT4/Yc6Kr0Z7Td4q7vfDmgAXXkV+ocJHZ/P
         Us/VhFFo6II+nRTnd3Ns6KaYR4Ki4Le/zUSHMjSjMrOmuJw0Fs5GsXv5Eii9AYA/jpcx
         /n6wQUgZeUCWuOQQdq6gR4c2CjdQmlsa/leCr3FL6qfFN9Qe99jiLB62DyDZJ3aaHHza
         lN1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3X19DOVd1akJOUzenSfU8TCU8pD1FjbzFLD3Ys0WiZXdtiH2r0
	8zS5dghewvU1ySBn00S85sCh7qFJv+Ay5vbPKXnBUTpW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6cSI7fmTvpzPhnPaJelGErRn3W+z5LgtlRJ7Ly1WBs9Qi9gWtvINbJHYQHDh9ZtnXe9Izx4xysXH3n4xDXteI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:94d2:b0:730:87c1:e86c with SMTP id
 dn18-20020a17090794d200b0073087c1e86cmr2870288ejc.129.1659352308882; Mon, 01
 Aug 2022 04:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <41f29835-b94f-ccfb-e437-b0bb48785aab@loongson.cn>
In-Reply-To: <41f29835-b94f-ccfb-e437-b0bb48785aab@loongson.cn>
From: Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 14:11:12 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMqzjesJbXhfVfuR-CwFvaCM1dbZVBZm6K4yAB66VZFZ2AYGSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [musl] A question about SA_RESTORER

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:27 PM =E7=8E=8B=E6=B4=AA=E4=BA=AE <wanghongliang@=
loongson.cn> wrote:
> LoongArch does not support SA_RESTORER,but must be define the macro
> of SA_RESTORER in LoongArch,otherwise a build error will occur.
> I want to ask if could consider the unsupported case about the
> reference of SA_RESTORER in architecture independent code?

Perhaps you could just `#define SA_RESTORER 0` in the corresponding
bits/signal.h?

--=20
Best regards,
Dmitry Selyutin