I get an error from printf i assume that underlying printf function is returning error code. In my native implementation i get incorrect results and really depends on the parameters i didn't dig into too deep to see what the pattern was On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:03 AM Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Andrew Snyder [2021-12-14 10:22:42 -0500]: > > I would like to be cc'd on the replies > > > > Looks like a bug in the musl printf functionality > > > > When using variable width format string and specifying a padding musl > fails > > to format properly. > > > > I am using musl indirectly through an emscripten compile of a native > > library. > > > > Consider the following repro steps using alpine docker image. Correct > > results exist when using ubuntu image > > > > # Correct expected ' 1' > > docker run -it --rm alpine printf %2i 1 > > # Correct expected ' 1' > > docker run -it --rm alpine printf %*i 2 1 > > # Correct expected '01' > > docker run -it --rm alpine printf %02i 1 > > # errors, Expected '01' > > docker run -it --rm alpine printf %0*i 2 1 > > i get the expected result on alpine > > $ printf %0*i 2 1 > 01 > > what do you get? > >