From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3373
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gregor Pintar <grpintar@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: High-priority library replacements?
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:30:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOPXC2=VCoQ9ByYUV+i=6Geet71-fmXAFHycHTx8JidccvrRxQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130425041553.GA13951@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<CAOPXC2=iHvRetaLzvdOuRKdXe5D19_-G+2N5vf-dxxYy7M6eQg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPLrYER960BeuYE31f=ES=m25O6PPpDUrXzRCTAhhaTROQbakQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOPXC2nthi=Lr9fPsVpc3sN3e-EupytUYJPB3neOzfvHz_dC0g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPLrYERfA-z40US==BB+v-2nAWoPsb6fkjtZ5-GnD+03YTx8ug@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369762267 27397 80.91.229.3 (28 May 2013 17:31:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:31:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3377-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue May 28 19:31:08 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3377-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3377-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1UhNjn-0006ZN-Qd
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 19:31:07 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 15728 invoked by uid 550); 28 May 2013 17:31:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 15720 invoked from network); 28 May 2013 17:31:06 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=GN8Ro9rJ5xtHr0E+sA0ur/v5QpDn4suTLN7amiJ9nBE=;
        b=cdDGKQwUguRn584aSEJ36Lrr9dhmiihs67j1VnLLI4EYlJOJPwwa2gxfKBXX0ubiQE
         WVUkJIVQt0GthJLgK/aoHGogCLB/odnmZ6zTJ74JW+5u9pDBqmsNnC/WTbtmxaAcn2QC
         H11KreqSooAfpMmwb9GrhPdyHbI/xopaCD0t/0HoPT2T4QjT/X9LdYup/M6lP+8Ol00R
         ST6qWv5PEuAboMDamItg7dk/ckx8n1Xwhf6wK3NNvjBhEmiFI/S7QOjEZPWr/Av0tyPy
         2S44iCQSWeZ1ci6ktO8qNik6tloJz7ClPMaqO1hwky+cM3iJuOV3s0UO+KMa6k4OZXk/
         Tguw==
X-Received: by 10.180.37.109 with SMTP id x13mr13186527wij.20.1369762255579;
 Tue, 28 May 2013 10:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPLrYERfA-z40US==BB+v-2nAWoPsb6fkjtZ5-GnD+03YTx8ug@mail.gmail.com>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3373
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3373>

2013/5/28, Daniel Cegie=C5=82ka <daniel.cegielka@gmail.com>:
> 2013/5/27 Gregor Pintar <grpintar@gmail.com>:
>
>> Unless someone really takes a deep look (vulnerabilities, TLS 1.2)
>> into tropicssl,
>
> I think that in a few weeks, I will have free time to do so. That's
> why I care about the opinion, if you are interested to use tropicssl's
> BSD code as ssl layer for kripto.
>
> Daniel
>
Yes, I think it would be good, but API could maybe be little
cleaner/simpler. I would suggest to use prefix (library name) on all
external symbols. PolarSSL and TropicSSL expose too much in header.
I'm think tropicssl compatibility doesn't mean anything as it is not
very popular, but we could add PolarSSL and OpenSSL compatibility
header. I would also look at axTLS's API
(http://axtls.sourceforge.net/dox/group__c__api.html). API is very
important, all other things can be fixed.

Currently I'm quite busy, but maybe I could help as I have problems
with kripto's API. I might get some ideas for it.


Gregor