From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3787
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Gregor Pintar <grpintar@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: musl 0.9.12 released
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:48:49 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOPXC2nSvSd3E8sbYuhtRKp7-1+db2iRL1rnUWzJKQkHXuLsNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130729073513.GA27186@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
	<CAOPXC2n+zX+8Gva4kVfycsmarkpbC6KAtCeCyBky7=ChzGK95g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130729180538.GD25714@port70.net>
	<CAOPXC2k4RyjK6Pp-0peEKScixZ_xbSpWuxt2zEszKRr5b2Yvcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130730142609.GA2033@Caracal>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375260540 16026 80.91.229.3 (31 Jul 2013 08:49:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-3791-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 31 10:49:02 2013
Return-path: <musl-return-3791-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-3791-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1V4S5e-00015R-09
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:49:02 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 23642 invoked by uid 550); 31 Jul 2013 08:49:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 23634 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2013 08:49:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=5mNWLD/qfbMBkJrPhYh/sO1/PHLtQGu1zo95j2hQ4yU=;
        b=BCFvleGp2aawm9KdoMVvizD2UXZtA3fHp33UPXxDNUDnKC5In1lDbKvfkC81EkBGpZ
         16qslnMIcvrOmXCnE1LGKuIJpT0bK6aDuh63pLnRpdPsgREmoyVNVQQEOuW2sxmPjLwl
         aTppppxIZD3rTjZ0tCCxQRuI4pV2y/N0CjNaZwFgC3tB68sw2T4icGtFw2lHj9Fqa00Z
         Uz3Hd2z+VhFfGJPN6GbMPMoAVWLAfVUSHcU6GCvfnEmS2KFSCpJInx+2uIsZJPIernuU
         OE7WveOaNORN4H1v97QCgCvdYvPNMOGAEAkNbBNO/L8cDrnPd5ch7jQw5gW7kJbdUE82
         UZqg==
X-Received: by 10.194.243.129 with SMTP id wy1mr48913661wjc.47.1375260529154;
 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 01:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130730142609.GA2033@Caracal>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:3787
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/3787>

2013/7/30, idunham@lavabit.com <idunham@lavabit.com>:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:14:34PM +0200, Gregor Pintar wrote:
>> 2013/7/29, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>:
>> > * Gregor Pintar <grpintar@gmail.com> [2013-07-29 19:37:19 +0200]:
>> >>
>> >> I have a problem. When I try to compile it, I get this:
>> >>
>> >
>> > are you sure the x86_64 arch is correct?
>> >
>> > seems gcc does not know about x86_64 registers in the asm
>> >
>> > i'd check the target in gcc -v
>>
>> Yes, x86_64 is correct arch. Target is also correct.
>> "as crt1.s" also works. It's probably something wrong with gcc.
>
> Maybe see what happens if you pass a flag that forces binutils to use
> 64-bit mode (--64 is documented in the as man page)?
>
> It looked to me like gcc generated 64-bit code, then invoked as
> in 32-bit mode.
>
> HTH,
> Isaac Dunham
>

I switched distribution yesterday.
I had similar problem when compiling kernel (it wanted gnu/stubs-32.h).
It was definitely something messed up with gcc.
Now it works.