From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5526 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2021 18:28:56 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 Nov 2021 18:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 23727 invoked by uid 550); 6 Nov 2021 18:28:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 23694 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2021 18:28:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=tEn3GfqqRfz4uYX2dJKVzFg0X4njtqUkfEzSqV47LK8=; b=BXkDoU4A5ZPyz4nqvkxKKo9vQNHrJ15w6fhy9I1W7Sweqo9MPvfX6r9mVRrFuy7paG gnfl0X+aQKkNU0DHdRF2McP35FtK5BK6reMB1kqE+LpjVVg6xZLDghiqdoavQHDP9PHL Dnm1SKPM4Shr26LzzzgxvhK4sCkkMjQVtOqU1442NhxENtINHYN3M+b0BYgmflv+BqMc WuySM4xdX4EpllhQg9xDF+O1NAyQiBLzbNwwJpo+kgVAwOzmev2Yx4f2PySlJ14GSMqy EnGHau4gk5yf3o68r41e0OFw4Jf15QLDgn7MjXJi2zWDHJ4qClb9Nfh8RXhO4m3KTtrO bzkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=tEn3GfqqRfz4uYX2dJKVzFg0X4njtqUkfEzSqV47LK8=; b=OD1PyK2ABauLR6BXBtcX4xi45Lfl0PKx1LjYYrimGvkFS0cqI8NiwTt+bqCgfnPB0a zhG+wL+kSNPSDS9HB/Qtwo/RddTz1/TEABnYHwA8mssGDLD1DGy8y8rWqG3Xa47xCY/A sa2q17tTmbR4WXSYPpHMuY4d0JnBwPX3nI8xcrMQMh42rJu6mMbNcFEC3dU2om612Wdt 9Y1p51/oDQat+Z54ySyfjAZ65Uit0x97y8AXhZ0ZPAL+sjl3mjh0UY6TcR8k3UcphOx4 goXCoDXhQjJ3wT2z9xTvbprQy0n1GiDVzBRZZTZ/MzuefT4laRa/HEbLJbo2HLSiAKiE 1F4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531LXP+kgTrdpwIUfJQFM1glxRDEyzXSNfgCJDLAZsmhHCNzOdcd fHxF2r9VLDIb+QpVJtcamnp5jHGHLTGvkh3rlLYD96nY X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXVqNyzdfWEciOu6BM7qC61MikhPTtRQt8onrCCGGGjrjz0IlkJdeSNCQevgl8gZerT5xhUKtjufwpNjKh4Yg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:36c9:: with SMTP id e9mr6521046lfs.87.1636223321842; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 11:28:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jon Chesterfield Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 18:28:31 +0000 Message-ID: To: musl@lists.openwall.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df2cd005d022ed39" Subject: Re: [musl] add noexcept to all functions please --000000000000df2cd005d022ed39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That's a compiler bug, surely. A C function that takes no callbacks is not going to throw. On Sat, 6 Nov 2021, 17:56 sotrdg sotrdg, wrote: > cpp-noexcept_call/README.md at main =C2=B7 tearosccebe/cpp-noexcept_call > (github.com) > > > > > The compiler does NOT treat the libc functions as noexcept functions in > C++. They do not. In fact I have got bitten by this. > > > > > > Sent from Mail for > Windows > > > --000000000000df2cd005d022ed39 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That's a compiler bug, surely. A C function that= takes no callbacks is not going to throw.

On Sat, 6 Nov 2021, 17:56 sotrdg so= trdg, <euloanty@live.com> wr= ote:

cpp-noexc= ept_call/README.md at main =C2=B7 tearosccebe/cpp-noexcept_call (github.com= )

=C2=A0

The compiler does NOT treat the libc functions as no= except functions in C++. They do not. In fact I have got bitten by this.=

=C2=A0

=C2=A0

Sent from Mail for Windows

=C2=A0

--000000000000df2cd005d022ed39--